[Amps] RE : schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7

[hermans]

If one isn't a surgeon, then stay away from the scalpel.

Jos on4kj

-----Message d'origine-----
De : amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] De la
part de Larry Carman
Envoyé : samedi 13 janvier 2007 0:15
À : amps at contesting.com
Objet : Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7


All I can say is that if you've been around long enough you can figure out
lots of things. I've been around in the ham community since 1979 and there's
a great variance in terminology. It's easy to determine what one says
especially when they have text explanation with it. Just to say you don't
understand when you really do is an ego problem. Let these people talk and
read there text without condemning them. It's definite that no one is
perfect. If you think you are, well, God help you. Regards, Larry N5BIP

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Fuqua
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 2:59 PM
To: garyschafer at comcast.net; 'Robert B. Bonner'; amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7

Sounds like CB jargon to me.
In my 45 years I never heard hams use terms like that.
I guess I have  a three-by-two hundred  sitting in my basement. 73 Bill
wa4lav


At 01:43 PM 1/12/2007 -0500, Gary Schafer wrote:
>What if the tube in question is a 4CX1000 and not a 4-1000?
>
>Why not just spell it out like most of the world is used to seeing 
>rather than trying to be cryptic or do short hand. More letters from 
>the keyboard aren't that expensive. :>)
>
>73
>Gary  K4FMX
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amps-bounces at contesting.com 
> > [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com]
On
> > Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:52 PM
> > To: amps at contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7
> >
> > 3X3 = 3CX3000A7, 4X5 = 4CX5000*, 4X1 = 4-1000A, 4X3 = 4CX3000A.
> >
> > The correct Pronunciation is Three By Three.
> >
> > Little tubes are referred to like "a couple three fives" 35 = 
> > 3-500Z's. But mostly are ignored by the big tube crowd like they 
> > don't exist.
> >
> > However it is acceptable when piling up stacks of smaller tubes to 
> > use AMPLIFIER names as referencing the PILE.  An SX refers to a pair 
> > of
8877.
> >
> > Ah, those crafty yanks....
> >
> > >From a previous lesson by the Professor, Pair of 4X1's = MOJO...
> >
> > BOB DD
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amps-bounces at contesting.com 
> > [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com]
On
> > Behalf Of Peter Chadwick
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:53 AM
> > To: John; amps at contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7
> >
> > What do you mean by "160m amp using the 3x3 "?
> > What is a "3x3"?
> > 73
> > Peter G3RZP
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com 
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com 
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps at contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps