[Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE)

[k7rdx]

Experiance using lackluster theory is risky at best.The point Tom made was
that some of the ceramic tubes work better(Efficiency,stability) at 50mhz
than basicially any of the glass tubes...I agree with this however, glass is
much cheaper at least for now..If ham radio survives the next 20 years or
so,ceramic will have taken over and prices will probably be within nearly
everyones budget..It took me a long time to "let go" of my old 4-1000`s(HF )
and move on to newer ceramic tubes...I`ll never look back but the old guys
did have a cool glow! 73,Jim K7RDX..
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian White GM3SEK" <gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk>
To: <Gudguyham at aol.com>
Cc: <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE)


Hello Lou
>In a message dated 1/21/2007 4:15:29 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk writes:
>  If practical experience seems to contradict that kind of theory, it's a
>  reliable sign that you got something wrong. And that can be a very
>  useful thing to know.

>In layman's terms I would say " the proof is in the pudding". Rick, K2XT
>and may others have tasted the pudding so they DO know the proof in
>this case. Lou

Yes, Lou, I have no dispute with you about that.

I was responding to someone else's statement that "experience trumps
theory, every time". Experience shows, that ain't so.


-- 

73 from Ian GM3SEK
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps