[Amps] Yawn

[jeremy-ca]

Lou, neither of us has ever said or even hinted that there are not better tubes for 6M. What the tiny minority of naysayers miss entirely is that the SB-200 is the best bang for the buck on the planet and that no voodo is required for putting it on 6M with a completly stable, neutralized and clean signal.

This thread has given me a few laughs but I think it is time to put it to bed. Ive no further interest in trying to convince that very tiny minority. Too much time wasted for no further return on the curve that has "flat lined".

Carl
KM1H

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gudguyham at aol.com 
  To: w8ji at contesting.com ; k7fm at teleport.com ; km1h at jeremy.mv.com ; g3rzp at g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk ; amps at contesting.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:39 PM
  Subject: Re: [Amps] stability of amps


  In a message dated 9/25/2007 11:59:54 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, w8ji at contesting.com writes:
    Looking at the issue pragmatically, if Carl and Lou are 
    > converting amplifiers that satisfy their customers, isn't 
    > that good enough?  Perhaps the debate about whether or not 
    > it is good engineering is no longer relevant.

    Of course, and everyone agrees on that point.

  I maintain that I use sound design techniques in my conversions and NO  voodo magic.  I'll agree there are better tubes for 6 meters.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.