[Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7
Dick Green WC1M
wc1m at msn.com
Tue Jan 1 12:28:08 EST 2008
Are you sure the Hi-Lo switch is in the Hi position? You'll get high grid
current if it's in the Lo position, and it'll be tough to get full output.
The switch should always be in the Hi position. Typical grid current in the
Hi position would be 35ma-70ma, and you should have no trouble driving the
amp to 1500W with 50W-70W. AlphaMax in my 87A usually autotunes to this
level. If the Yellow LEDs comes on intermittently, you may have a bad relay
or connection between the shack and antenna farm.
73, Dick WC1M
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jsternmd [mailto:jsternmd at earthlink.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7
>
>
> What would typical grid current be for an Alpha 87A running 1500w on
> 20
> or 40m? My 87A gets up to 105 ma (Yellow LED) at times (into a very
> low
> SWR antenna or dummy load). Is this normal? WOuld the 3CPX800A run
> 1500w at a lower grid current?
>
> 73 de K1JOS (Jerry)
> CCA #11906
> CRA #1777
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of amps-request at contesting.com
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:37 AM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Amps Digest, Vol 60, Issue 45
>
>
> Send Amps mailing list submissions to
> amps at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> amps-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> amps-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than
> "Re: Contents of Amps digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Alpha 87A Tubes (Gary Smith)
> 2. Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ? (DC)
> 3. Re: Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ? (jeremy-ca)
> 4. Re: Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ? (Paul
> Hewitt)
> 5. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425 (Gary Smith)
> 6. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425 (Gary Smith)
> 7. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425 (Gary Smith)
> 8. Looking for David Kechkaylo (TS711A at aol.com)
> 9. 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (Mike Bondarev)
> 10. Re: 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (Roger)
> 11. Re: 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (jeremy-ca)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:08:56 -0800
> From: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes
> To: "Larry P. Greenberg" <wa9mag at ameritech.net>,
> <amps at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <007e01c84b30$997c1b20$4001a8c0 at garys>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> 3CX800A7's are standard (from the factory) in my/their Ameritron
> AL-800H. Never had a minute's problem with them. Runs "legal" all
> bands
> easily, but I
> do pay attention to the grid current.
> There is a tube the 3CX P 800A7, only diff is they are rated for pulse
> service.
> My .02 on this thread,
> 73's,
> Gary...wa6fgi
>
>
> ------ Original Message -----
> From: "Larry P. Greenberg" <wa9mag at ameritech.net>
> To: <amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:31 AM
> Subject: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes
>
>
> >I copied the following from the Alpha website.
> >
> > The Alpha 87A, 89 and 86 were designed to use the YC-238 tube
> which
>
> > is
> > an Eimac 3CX800A7 that has been screened for low grid current.
> Replacing
> > one or both of the tubes in your amplifier with a regular 3CX800 or
> with a
> > 3CPX800 could lead to unintended problems and consequences which
> again
> we
> > are not able to cover under warranty.
> >
> > I don't find YC-238 tubes on the Eimac website. While I understand
> > that
> > we may not want to use non Eimac tubes in our amplifiers, I don't
> > understand why replacements cannot be non-matched Eimac 3CX800A7
> tubes
>
> > that can be purchased from known wholesale dealers or reputable
> hamfest
> > dealers. I would like to keep spare finals on the shelf but $1,500
> a
> pair
> > is really steep.
> >
> > Has anybody used regular 3CX800A7's in their amplifier? Is the YC-
> 238
> > nomenclature an Eimac name or an Alpha name? Does anybody have a
> > specification sheet that they can send me?
> >
> > Larry, WA9MAG
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:41:08 -0500
> From: "DC" <daclark56 at hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ?
> To: <amps at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <BLU126-DAV13D200DCC88E663CA32FB9BE570 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Is the 3CX P 800A7 interchangable with the 3CX800A7?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:20:12 -0500
> From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ?
> To: "DC" <daclark56 at hotmail.com>, <amps at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <014101c84b42$eaaa8e70$6500a8c0 at KITTYMA123>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> All varieties can be considered the same tube for ham use.
> Also any Eimac tube beginning with a Y is automatically 40-100% more
> expensive than its regular production brethren.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DC" <daclark56 at hotmail.com>
> To: <amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 5:41 PM
> Subject: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ?
>
>
> > Is the 3CX P 800A7 interchangable with the 3CX800A7?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:44:53 -0800
> From: "Paul Hewitt" <wd7s at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ?
> To: "DC" <daclark56 at hotmail.com>, <amps at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <002801c84b46$5d0e95d0$9539f604 at qroproductions>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Yes and no. The CPX version is rated for a higher plate voltage than
> the CX
> version with the Eimac tube. The CPX tube has a taller ceramic
> insulating
> portion at the base. The Svetlana CPX and CX versions had the same
> ceramic
> height and both will take the higher plate voltage.
> 73, Paul
>
> PAUL HEWITT
> WD7S PRODUCTIONS
> QRO HOMEBREW COMPONENTS
> http://home.earthlink.net/~wd7s
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DC" <daclark56 at hotmail.com>
> To: <amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 2:41 PM
> Subject: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ?
>
>
> > Is the 3CX P 800A7 interchangable with the 3CX800A7?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:51:28 -0500
> From: "Gary Smith" <Gary at doctorgary.net>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425
> To: Amps at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <477804D0.5692.12D1044 at Gary.doctorgary.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> I've tried that and the amp keys but it does not seem to key the
> Corsair. I can see where there's a slight dip in voltage and a show
> of some grid current to the 425 when I key but the key out from the
> 425 into the key in of the corsair does not trigger the corsair.
>
> If I run the key in to the corsair via the same RCA jack, the corsair
> transmits just fine.
>
> So key the amp? yes but the amp key the corsair? No.
>
> Ideas?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gary
>
> > No. QSK and Ext T/R are very different. The corsair never had the
> > TXOut and TXEn lines on it, which are required for a QSK amp. What
> > you are supposed to do is connect Ext T/R to the amplifier keying
> > line. This will not give you QSK but it will work with the amp that
> > way.
> >
> > Another completely different approach is to connect your keyer
> output
> > directly to where TXOut would have been connected to the amp. Then
> > connect the output keying line of the amp to key the corsair. This
> > will give you QSK and guarantee that the amp keys before the corsair
> > transmits.
> >
> > Carl Moreschi N4PY
> > 121 Little Bell Drive
> > Bell Mountain
> > Hays, NC 28635
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gary Smith" <Gary at doctorgary.net>
> > To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 7:37 PM
> > Subject: [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425
> >
> >
> > > Am sending the Omni V to TenTec for allignment. Not sure of the
> best
>
> > > way to connect my back up rig (Corsair II) to the amp for QSK.
> > >
> > > With the Omni V I connected the TX out & TX en to their
> counterparts
>
> > > on the 425. I see no TX out or TX en on the Corsair but there
> exists
>
> > > QSK and EXT T/R connectors on the Corsair. Are these the same
> > > function but different names? I do want to use QSK.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gary
> > > KA1J
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:01:52 -0500
> From: "Gary Smith" <Gary at doctorgary.net>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425
> To: Amps at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <47780740.29591.13692D6 at Gary.doctorgary.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Carl, somehow related to the keyer & the 425...
>
> If I run a straight key into the 425 as you suggested, it works fine
> and the amp & Corsair both fire.
>
> By the keyer alone it triggers the 425 but the 425 does not trigger
> the Corsair.
>
> Interesting.
>
> Gary
>
> > Hi Carl,
> >
> > I've tried that and the amp keys but it does not seem to key the
> > Corsair. I can see where there's a slight dip in voltage and a show
> of
>
> > some grid current to the 425 when I key but the key out from the 425
> > into the key in of the corsair does not trigger the corsair.
> >
> > If I run the key in to the corsair via the same RCA jack, the
> corsair
> > transmits just fine.
> >
> > So key the amp? yes but the amp key the corsair? No.
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > > No. QSK and Ext T/R are very different. The corsair never had the
> >
> > > TXOut and TXEn lines on it, which are required for a QSK amp. What
> >
> > > you are supposed to do is connect Ext T/R to the amplifier keying
> > > line. This will not give you QSK but it will work with the amp
> > that
> > > way.
> > >
> > > Another completely different approach is to connect your keyer
> > output
> > > directly to where TXOut would have been connected to the amp. Then
> >
> > > connect the output keying line of the amp to key the corsair. This
> >
> > > will give you QSK and guarantee that the amp keys before the
> > corsair
> > > transmits.
> > >
> > > Carl Moreschi N4PY
> > > 121 Little Bell Drive
> > > Bell Mountain
> > > Hays, NC 28635
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Gary Smith" <Gary at doctorgary.net>
> > > To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 7:37 PM
> > > Subject: [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am sending the Omni V to TenTec for allignment. Not sure of the
> > best
> > > > way to connect my back up rig (Corsair II) to the amp for QSK.
> > > >
> > > > With the Omni V I connected the TX out & TX en to their
> > counterparts
> > > > on the 425. I see no TX out or TX en on the Corsair but there
> > exists
> > > > QSK and EXT T/R connectors on the Corsair. Are these the same
> > > > function but different names? I do want to use QSK.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > > KA1J
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:11:51 -0500
> From: "Gary Smith" <Gary at doctorgary.net>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] [TenTec] Corsair II & Titan 425
> To: Amps at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <47780997.4618.13FB825 at Gary.doctorgary.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Ah rats,
>
> Cross post. Sorry
>
> Gary
> KA1J
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:07:47 EST
> From: TS711A at aol.com
> Subject: [Amps] Looking for David Kechkaylo
> To: Amps at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <d01.205cf240.34a9e133 at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hello, does anyone have an email for David Kechkaylo? He worked at
> Heathkit
> at one time and has lots of good info. I only find old posts from him
> online.
> Thanks !!
>
>
>
> **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
> (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:42:34 +0300
> From: Mike Bondarev <mikebond at mosfirm.ru>
> Subject: [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ?
> To: Amps at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <1494475189.20071231104234 at mosfirm.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hello to everybody! Happy New Year 2008!
> In the coming year I would like to build an amplifier for "everyday
> use". For the contesting I already made the amplifier with GU-84B and
> GM3SEK's tetrode boards and it work fantastic! The second amp I would
> like to make with glass tubes. What you guys can recommend me? I was
> thinking about two 813 in grounded grid configurations but now I'm
> thinking why not the pair of 3-500zg from RF-parts? I newer used 3-
> 500zg
> before so I can't compare it to 813. I understand the difference in
> pricing but I also know it's easy to buy matched set of 3-500zg but
> it's
> just impossible to find matched pair of 813.
>
> Regards, Mike RL3BM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:32:29 -0500
> From: "Roger" <sub1 at rogerhalstead.com>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ?
> To: <Amps at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <000401c84b87$aea7cd80$6600a8c0 at shop32>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> My personal opinions:
>
> The 813 is a nice tube and I have built amps using them. However the
> 3-500Z is a current tube, in production, and not outlandishly
> priced.
> As far as as a matched pair, I've never worried about that with 3-500s
> unless they are way off and I've not found any that were. The 3-500s
> are
> not a higain tube, but if you have an honest 100 watts and enough
> plate
> voltage they'll run the legal limit.
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
>
>
>
> > Hello to everybody! Happy New Year 2008!
> > In the coming year I would like to build an amplifier for "everyday
> > use". For the contesting I already made the amplifier with GU-84B
> and
> > GM3SEK's tetrode boards and it work fantastic! The second amp I
> would
>
> > like to make with glass tubes. What you guys can recommend me? I was
> > thinking about two 813 in grounded grid configurations but now I'm
> > thinking why not the pair of 3-500zg from RF-parts? I newer used
> > 3-500zg before so I can't compare it to 813. I understand the
> > difference in pricing but I also know it's easy to buy matched set
> of
> > 3-500zg but it's just impossible to find matched pair of 813.
> >
> > Regards, Mike RL3BM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:36:44 -0500
> From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ?
> To: "Mike Bondarev" <mikebond at mosfirm.ru>, <Amps at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <002501c84bb2$313e7da0$6500a8c0 at KITTYMA123>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> The 813 is almost a 70 year old design yet it is still one of the best
> tubes
> ever made.
>
> Brand new US military surplus ones are on Ebay on a regular basis and
> at
>
> very low prices. No matching is required. I recently bought 4 813's
> and
> sockets off Ebay for around $80 for all. These are for an AM
> amplifier.
>
> In GG service the 813 IMD is in the -33dB range according to published
> info
> making it a very clean performer.
>
> My regular SSB/CW HF amp uses 3-500Z's and they are also an excellent
> tube.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Bondarev" <mikebond at mosfirm.ru>
> To: <Amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 2:42 AM
> Subject: [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ?
>
>
> > Hello to everybody! Happy New Year 2008!
> > In the coming year I would like to build an amplifier for "everyday
> > use". For the contesting I already made the amplifier with GU-84B
> and
> > GM3SEK's tetrode boards and it work fantastic! The second amp I
> would
>
> > like to make with glass tubes. What you guys can recommend me? I was
> > thinking about two 813 in grounded grid configurations but now I'm
> > thinking why not the pair of 3-500zg from RF-parts? I newer used
> > 3-500zg before so I can't compare it to 813. I understand the
> > difference in pricing but I also know it's easy to buy matched set
> of
> > 3-500zg but it's just impossible to find matched pair of 813.
> >
> > Regards, Mike RL3BM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> End of Amps Digest, Vol 60, Issue 45
> ************************************
>
More information about the Amps
mailing list