[Amps] MLA-2500
Kimberly Elmore
cw_de_n5op at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jan 25 12:01:57 EST 2008
My Dad had an MLA-2500. I recall that we had to add some fixed C-load for it to load properly on 160 m; even at that, it didn't do well below about 1.85 MHz or so. It was also not very efficient on 10 m because the output tank had a loaded Q that was too high. Never tried it on 12 or 17 m. But, other than that, it seemed to be a fine, very compact amp. Made about 600-700 W output, if I recall. His had the original tubes (made, apparently, of unobtainium) in it and saw service only on 75 m and (mostly) 40 m SSB. I don't think the efficiency was particularly noteworthy. Prior to my Dad becoming an SK, I replaced the filter caps in the HV PS after the originals became leaky. That was a bit of a job... Unlike my AL-80A, I also recall that it would only tune properly with the covers on and secured.
73,
Kim Elmore N5OP
At 11:01 AM 1/25/2008, n4zed at comcast.net wrote:
>I suspect something is wrong also but I think it is in the design and
not
>in any particular component failure. I've done the usual Google search
and
>found the loading problem is common with this amp. During the search
I
>have found no fixes to the problem.
>
>This amp had never been powered up when I got it about 3 months ago..
The
>power cable had never been connected to a plug and the tubes were
still in
>the original boxes from Eimac. The relay contacts as far as I could
tell
>had never been energized and showed no sighs of any electrical
contact at
>the contacts(that sounded weird), none of the connectors on the rear
had
>any sigh of a connector being screwed on or pushed on.
>
>There are places on the web that covers a gold sputtering problem with
the
>2500 and the 8875 tubes due to VHF parasitics and other high Mu tubes
for
>that matter.
>
>There are others that say they have ran their 2500 for 20 years and
had no
>problems.
>
>The amp works fine, good output, good reports. So why fix something
thats
>not broken right? I just want to keep it that way, the tubes are way
too
>expensive to replace. One good thing about buying something that has
been
>out in the field a long time is that you get to see what kinds of
problems
>there were with the design and hopefully fix it before it hits you in
the
>wallet or something very close to the wallet.
>
>Ken
>
>*************************************************************************
>
>
>
>Somethings definitely wrong then.
>
>Id start by closely inspecting the bandswitch and plate choke.
>
>BTW, the cover has to be in place when tuning, the steel that close to
the
>coil has a huge effect.
>
>Carl
>KM1H
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
More information about the Amps
mailing list