[Amps] 3-500Z viable after long storage?

[Randall, Randy]

How about using a 1100 watt microwave tranny for the HV supply?  It could supply a rectified, filtered voltage and via a variac the voltage could be adjusted.  There is current limiting in the tranny already and you could use the timer to pulse the HV on and off reducing the duty cycle to keep it from overheating.

Randy AB9GO

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ian White GM3SEK
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:00 AM
To: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 3-500Z viable after long storage?


The following procedure came directly from a former Eimac tube designer,
who was with the company when they were still manufacturing glass tubes.


<quote>
*************************

If a tube was last used years ago, or was manufactured years ago, or is
new, it's safest to assume it needs gettering. And the suggested routine
is this:

Cooling is of course required throughout.

a.  Bring the filament up to rated voltage slowly.  For example, run
the primary of the filament transformer through a light bulb, or
similar to limit the shock of turning it on.

b.  Then after some time, bring the voltage to the specified value,
and run it for about 100 hours.

c.  Then, apply the anode voltage through some current limiting means
for a while, and, finally,

d.  Run the tube at a dissipation level near the specified limit for
a few hours.

The reason for this is that the getter needs to experience a spectrum
of temperatures, mopping up different species at different
temperatures.  Furthermore, the lowly 3-500Z for example, has getters
at the base of the grid and the base of the filament as well as
sprayed on the anode.

While this conditioning schedule is seemingly over-complicated and
ultra-conservative, it should result in no surprises when putting the
tube into service.

Terms like "a few hours" are vague because different tubes require
different treatment.  If we're "burning in" a monster tube that will
cost us $50,000 to replace, we're going to be more conservative than
with a $50 tube.

***************************
<end quote>





--

73 from Ian GM3SEK
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.