[Amps] No parasitic choke question

[Roger]

On 7/28/2010 2:43 PM, Carl wrote:
> Its easy when you copy established designs and info. Amp building IS NOT
> that hard. Even CBers do it........
>    
Yah, but from what I've seen so far, they aren't exactly worried about 
purity of emissions.<:-))  If the original design called for two 3-500Zs 
then 5 should be even better and class C gives even more power.<:-))

I agree though that copying a design (like building a kit) normally 
works, but as soon as you start improvising...

73

Roger (K8RI)
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:<donroden at hiwaay.net>
> To: "Amps reflector"<amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:22 AM
> Subject: [Amps] No parasitic choke question
>
>
>    
>> There seems to be three camps in this discussion..
>> Nychrome, no nychrome, and now neither.
>>
>> Eliminate the parasitic; eliminate the suppressor.
>>
>> \If eliminating the suppressor can :
>> ( 1 )  produce less heating above 20Mhz
>> ( 2 )  protect the tube and associated components
>>
>> I believe a lot of us would like to know your better way.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Don WA4NPL
>>
>>
>>
>> Quoting "Bill, W6WRT"<dezrat1242 at yahoo.com>:
>>
>>      
>>> My amps do not need or have VHF parasitic suppressors.
>>> I came to realize that tubes can be made to not oscillate in
>>> other, better ways.
>>>
>>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>