[Amps] 'Good engineering'

Dwayne 863 at telus.net
Fri Mar 26 16:57:46 PDT 2010


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac at arrl.net>
To: <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering'


> Canada has adopted a very progressive sets of rules for amateur-class
> service, particularly with respect to output power, occupied bandwidth, 
> and
> license classes.  If Canadian amateurs wish to fully exploit the SSB power
> rule under Section 10.2 (b)(i) of Industry Canada's RIC-2 regulations,
> that's their prerogative.  In doing so, they are compliant with their 
> rules
> and regulations of the Canadian government.
>Carefull thats a secret.....
Dwayne Ve6qx
> In order to attain a power level specified under Section 10.2(b)(i), it's
> reasonable to assume that power supplies and RF circuits as mentioned by
> VE7RF are wholly reasonable.  Canadian licensed operators answer only to 
> the
> Canadian government -- not the FCC in the United States.
>
>>From RIC-2:
>
> "10.2 Amateur Radio Operator Certificate with Basic and Advanced
> Qualifications
> The holder of an Amateur Radio Operator Certificate with Basic and 
> Advanced
> Qualifications is limited to a maximum transmitting power of:
>
> (a) where expressed as direct-current input power, 1,000 W to the anode or
> collector circuit of the transmitter stage that supplies radio frequency
> energy to the antenna; or
>
> (b) where expressed as radio frequency output power measured across an
> impedance-matched load,
>
> (i) 2,250 W peak envelope power for transmitters that produce any type of
> single sideband emission, or
>
> (ii) 750 W carrier power for transmitters that produce any other type of
> emission."
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 



More information about the Amps mailing list