[Amps] The old PEP question.

Carl km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Fri Oct 8 09:25:54 PDT 2010


Simpler and better? Maybe for those who cant handle the math of the simplest 
and adequate method.

And nobody on here has ever called the Bird lab accurate.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Radio WC6W" <wc6w_amps at yahoo.com>
To: "Alek Petkovic" <vk6apk at bigpond.com>; <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] The old PEP question.


> Hi Alek,
>  Here's a better, simpler solution...
>
> http://qsl.net/wc6w/wc6waccy/index.html?fr40.html
>
>  Note: If you are using Explorer 8 or 9, "Compatabilty Mode" must be 
> selected on the "Tools" menu to properly view my webpage.
>
> 73 & Good morning,
>  Marv WC6W
>
> http://qsl.net/wc6w/
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/7/10, Alek Petkovic <vk6apk at bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>>> Take a look at http://vk1od.net/module/PepAmp/PeakAmp.htm and build
>> it.
>>
>> You will then be able to read PEP on your meter.
>>
>> 73, Alek.
>> VK6APK
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 



More information about the Amps mailing list