[Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB?

Rob Atkinson ranchorobbo at gmail.com
Sun Jun 5 13:15:57 PDT 2011


Because I did not know they were going for that much.  Where do you
see the high prices?  under tables at flea markets?

Rob
K5UJ

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Fuqua, Bill L <wlfuqu00 at uky.edu> wrote:
> With HC10 going for more than receivers such as HQ180s and HQ170s why would you buy one?
> These have the same IF ans in the HC10.
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
> ________________________________________
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rob Atkinson [ranchorobbo at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 1:40 PM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB?
>
> If you wind up with an old AM/CW rx with a 455 KHz IF you can keep a
> look out for a hammarlund HC-10 and it will give you SSB coverage and
> maintain the tube signal chain.
>
> I don't know what the prices are but RME might be a manufacturer to
> look for.  I have seen NC300s go for pretty cheap so that is certainly
> a very good rx for the money and ya gotta love that weighted flywheel
> tuning.
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


More information about the Amps mailing list