[Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB?

[Carl]

Because they go well with a R-390/390A, HRO-60, and other radios that are 
approaching or above $1000 these days.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00 at uky.edu>
To: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>; <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 
160-10mReceiversforSSB?


> With HC10 going for more than receivers such as HQ180s and HQ170s why 
> would you buy one?
> These have the same IF ans in the HC10.
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
> ________________________________________
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf 
> Of Rob Atkinson [ranchorobbo at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 1:40 PM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 
> 160-10mReceiversforSSB?
>
> If you wind up with an old AM/CW rx with a 455 KHz IF you can keep a
> look out for a hammarlund HC-10 and it will give you SSB coverage and
> maintain the tube signal chain.
>
> I don't know what the prices are but RME might be a manufacturer to
> look for.  I have seen NC300s go for pretty cheap so that is certainly
> a very good rx for the money and ya gotta love that weighted flywheel
> tuning.
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1511/3682 - Release Date: 06/05/11
>