[Amps] $120 tube running a 1500 watt amplifier

[Carl]

Believe me Alek, its full! Walk up attic,  2 floors of living, plus a full 
basement, a garage, a 48' trailer and a couple of storage sheds. Ham and 
military gear, some commercial/marine and lots of consumer radios from 
1920's to 70's plus tubes and parts up the yazoo.
Been selling stuff off slowly so as to not depress the market (-;

Its far better than a 401K or other useless piece of paper in what used to 
be the USA.

When I reach room temperature someone can take videos for You Tube and the 
estate sale.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alek Petkovic" <vk6apk at bigpond.com>
To: <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] $120 tube running a 1500 watt amplifier


> Boy, I'd love to look at your shack/shed/junkbox. :-)
>
> 73, Alek
> VK6APK
>
>
>
>
> On 22/08/2012 2:03 AM, Carl wrote:
>> Over the past 3-4 years I paid $15, 20 and free for 3 very nice ones that
>> are actually being used with various boat anchors. No dynamotors but 
>> cranks
>> were included.
>>
>> I do have a full set of RX and TX all NOS with some still crated as part 
>> of
>> the collection. Most obtained in the 60's.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "peter chadwick" <g8on at fsmail.net>
>> To: "Bill W6WRT" <dezrat1242 at yahoo.com>; "AMPS" <amps at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] $120 tube running a 1500 watt amplifier
>>
>>
>>> So the BC453 (unmodified, full set of tubes, but less dynamotor) that I
>>> got for $15 last year was reasonably priced then?
>>> 73
>>> Peter G3RZP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ========================================
>>> Message Received: Aug 21 2012, 05:37 PM
>>> From: "Bill, W6WRT"
>>> To: "AMPS"
>>> Cc:
>>> Subject: Re: [Amps] $120 tube running a 1500 watt amplifier
>>>
>>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:47:44 -0700 (PDT), Jerry wrote:
>>>
>>>> *** Ouch! 5C for a Q5'er? I think I have a set of the IF coils from one
>>>> of those in a box somewhere in my junk. I seem to remember the IF was
>>>> quite selective because it was 80kHz or so.
>>>>
>>>> - Jerry
>>> REPLY:
>>> No, the one that went for over $500 wasn't a Q5'er, it was the broadcast
>>> band
>>> version, .5 to 1.5 Mc. The Q5'er is the band below that one. But even
>>> they, new
>>> and unmodified fetch a good price.
>>>
>>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5212 - Release Date: 08/20/12
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>
> -- 
> http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
> http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap
>
> Family Businesses:
> Petkovic Air & Gas. petkovicag at bigpond.com
> SP Electrical. www.spelectrical.net.au
> Hampers by Hand. www.facebook.com/hampersbyhand
>
>
>
>
>
> =======
> Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
> (Email Guard: 9.0.0.2298, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.20440)
> http://www.pctools.com/
> =======
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5215 - Release Date: 08/21/12
>