[Amps] Shortwave Returns? [Was: testing the biggest one]

[peter chadwick]

Exactly, Karl-Arne!

Tak!

73

Peter G3RZP

========================================
 Message Received: Aug 03 2013, 08:09 PM
 From: "Karl-Arne Markström" <sm0aom at telia.com>
 To: g8on at fsmail.net, "Richard Solomon" <dickw1ksz at gmail.com>, "amps at contesting.com" <amps at contesting.com>
 Cc: 
 Subject: Sv: Re: [Amps] Shortwave Returns? [Was: testing the biggest one]
 
 It is all about "price/performance", or cost per prospective listener.
 The Ministries of Propaganda have decided to use their funds for other 
 purposes than HF broadcast.
 
 
 ----Ursprungligt meddelande----
 Från: g8on at fsmail.net
 Datum: 2013-08-03 18:02
 Till: "Richard Solomon"<dickw1ksz at gmail.com>, "amps at contesting.com"
 <amps at contesting.com>
 Ärende: Re: [Amps] Shortwave Returns? [Was: testing the biggest one]
 
 There's still a lot of Africa and some Asian countries e.g. parts of 
 rural India and rural Bangladesh who have no mains electricity, 
 internet or money for TVRO satellite equipment, where a battery powered 
 HF receiver is about all they can have. Probably the same applies to a 
 fair amount of rural China, too, and certainly to rural North Korea, 
 where the censorship is heavy. But whether the number of listeners and 
 their influence is enough to justify super power HFBC is another 
 matter. Depends on just how much one figures the propaganda is worth.
 
 Fifty years ago, practically every newly independent nation 'HAD' to 
 have its HFBC for the 'Voice of Swazibanana' or whatever, in the same 
 way as they 'HAD' to have an national airline flying internationally. 
 Now it seems to be realised that these, in general, can't be afforded.
 
 73
 
 Peter G3RZP
 _______________________________________________
 Amps mailing list
 Amps at contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps