[Amps] 813 efficiency
Eddy Swynar
deswynar at xplornet.ca
Mon Feb 25 10:00:26 EST 2013
On 2013-02-23, at 5:19 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:01:55 -0500, Eddy wrote:
>
>> It absolutely gobsmacks me how some guys in this hobby would rather whip-out the ol' VISA card & spend literally HUNDREDS on power amplifier tubes, when the lowly ol' 813---paired with some twins, of course!---will do the job as well, and at an absolute FRACTION of the price...
>
> REPLY:
> To get the plate dissipation of a single 8877 would take 12 813s.
>
> Would you put them all in a row? Or a matrix of 3x4? Or 6x2?
> Or maybe in a circle? Can't wait to hear. :-)
>
Hi Bill,
I am obviously missing something here: why would you want to maximize plate DISSIPATION, anyway...?!
I grew up always believing that the first goal in ANY amplifier was the maximizing of plate EFFICIENCY, a.k.a. OUTPUT.
Since when did the contest exchanges & participants on the Ham bands suddenly take an interest in the plate dissipation of your amplifier tubes...? The various exchanges wanna know your "power", & NOT your "plate dissipation"... :o)
Besides, the cost of 12 brand new 813s would STILL be but a fraction of the price of a new 8877...
~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
More information about the Amps
mailing list