[Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design
peter chadwick
g8on at fsmail.net
Thu Oct 24 08:36:33 EDT 2013
Jim,
ITU-R Rec. SM.329-12. Although this is a recommendation, through a somewhat complex route, it is called for in the International Radio Regulations, which are considered to be a treaty in international law. The FCC have sort of implemented it with their 43dB, although the requirement is for suppression of unwanted emissions in the amateur service to be 43dB + 10log P, without needing to be greater than 50dB for stations operating below 30MHz and not needing to be greater than 70dB for stations operating above 30 MHz.
In Europe, the requirements are slightly different and are in ERC/REC 74-01.
========================================
Message Received: Oct 24 2013, 12:51 PM
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom at telus.net>
To: amps at contesting.com
Cc:
Subject: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:26:50 +0200
From: peter chadwick <g8on at fsmail.net>
To: Jim Thomson <jim.thom at telus.net>, amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] ?200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design
## I checked..and cant find any reference to minimum harmonic suppression requirements anywhere......so far.
If you manage to find out..... pse let me know.
Jim VE7RF
Jim,
The regulations state in level in the feedline. However, I could ask one of my friends at Industry Canada what they think.....
73
Peter G3RZP
========================================
Message Received: Oct 22 2013, 03:06 PM
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom at telus.net>
To: amps at contesting.com
Cc:
Subject: [Amps] ?200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:32:27 +0200
From: peter chadwick <g8on at fsmail.net>
To: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] ?200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?
>The touted higher harmonic suppression of a PI-L is mainly a myth.....a plane jane PI is more than ample for harmonic suppression.<
As a Class AB stage has a second harmonic component of plate current only 6dB down on the fundamental, what sort of Q do you run in the pi network to get the extra 37dB of suppression needed to meet the FCC regulations or the extra 44dB needed elsewhere?
73
Peter G3RZP
## ameritron uses a simple PI net on 40-10m on their bigger amps...and it easily meets the 44 db down FCC requirements. Ameritron uses a PI-L on 160+80m..but that?s so a smaller load cap can be used.
My ants all exhibit sky high swr on their harmonics..including the 3rd...so whats the problem ? Me, I could care less about harmonic suppression since the amp kills most of it..and the ants kill the rest. My F12 40m yagi barely resonates just a bit below the
12m band...and not at all on 15m. Optibeam uses linear decoupling stubs on their 40m yagis so they wont resonate on 15m. I enter a Q of 8-10 on the GM3SEK spreadsheet for all my hb amps. 30-36 db of 2nd harmonic suppression
is plenty imo..... from any amp. With 1 kw out....and 36 db down.... that means 1/4 watt on the 2nd harmonic. .25 watt into a sky high swr isnt gonna bother anybody anytime soon.
Jim VE7RF
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
More information about the Amps
mailing list