[Amps] low pass filter fail ;)
ZL2AAA
zl2aaa at nowmail.co.nz
Tue Apr 29 02:19:02 EDT 2014
Having made a good number of low pass filters some with disastrous results
the biggest problem appears to be able to get reliable current ratings of
the cap !Morrie
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:33 PM
To: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] low pass filter fail ;)
If you model the filter in LTSpice, you can look at all the voltages and
currents and see if the capacitors are up to the task.
Tom W0IVJ
On 4/28/2014 5:34 PM, Carl wrote:
> The most common cause Ive seen for filter problems is choosing the wrong
> cap for the job such as one designed for industrial service and not RF. I
> still see people using 60's TV doorknobs of 500pf 30-40KV in a 1500W + HF
> amp; even in parallel they literally come apart.
>
> Jims comment about parallel caps is also valid; my 3CX1000A7 1500W 2M amp
> uses 6 100pf 7.5KV HT-58 size caps for the split plate line and has been
> holding up fine for 25+ years with no tuning drift.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom at telus.net>
> To: <amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 5:33 PM
> Subject: [Amps] low pass filter fail ;)
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:32:04 +0200
>> From: peter chadwick <g8on at fsmail.net>
>> To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242 at wildblue.net>, amps at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] low pass filter fail ;)
>>
>>
>> With a VSWR of only 1.2:1, I wouldn't have thought it was too close to
>> the cut off frequency. Passive LC filters (other than the absorptive
>> types) work by having a high VSWR in the stop-band. According to the
>> table in Geffe's book (Simplified Modern Filter Design), a VSWR of 1.22:1
>> represents a ripple of 0.04dB. I would suspect a lossy capacitor - we
>> don't know the details of the filter designs and exactly what the
>> capacitor was, nor the power level. You can have some high currents at
>> quite low power levels.
>>
>> vy 73
>>
>> Peter G3RZP
>>
>>
>> ## 2m is 144-148 mhz. So where is the optimum cutoff freq ?
>> Heck, even with a 200 mhz cutoff freq.... it will still kill the 2nd and
>> up harmonics.
>> Most of the problems I have had with LP filters for HF is the caps..and
>> their current ratings. U are better off to use say 2 x 100 pf cap vs
>> a single 200 pf cap.
>>
>> ## I have one of last built henry radio 10 kw HF LP filters..with
>> 7-16 dins on each end. They used a mess of 25 + 50 pf NPO caps...and
>> all are HT-57 types.
>> They used a single 50 pf at each connector ..and in the middle of the
>> filter, between the 2 x .25” OD tubing coils, they used 8 x 25 pf
>> doorknobs in parallel.
>> Cut off was at aprx 33 mhz.
>>
>> ## HT-57 caps are rated for 15 kv...and in low values..are not only
>> NPO..they also handle one helluva lot of current. LP Box was aprx
>> 5.5 inch square x 10-12 inches long.
>> Of course on the lower freqs, like 160-12m..the size of the LP box
>> becomes huge.
>>
>> ## Those 5 kw band pass filters made in the uk are slick. band pass is
>> better than a LP. They were band pass on all HF bands except 160m.
>> 160m is a LP.
>>
>> ## LP filters for VHF is not that big a deal. You can see the
>> various LP filters available for 88-108 mhz FM broadcast. Those
>> filters are available with any
>> cut off freq u want..and any power rating too...like 25 watt up to the
>> sky is the limit.
>>
>> Jim VE7RF
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2014.0.4570 / Virus Database: 3920/7407 - Release Date: 04/28/14
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
More information about the Amps
mailing list