[Amps] Time for New Power Meter
Carl
km1h at jeremy.qozzy.com
Sat May 2 22:06:02 EDT 2015
I have Bird slugs of different power levels thru 2304 mHz plus various
attenuators and directional couplers good thru at least 3 gHz. Ive never let
an accuracy percentage in any of the parts concern me as if I absolutely
have to I can use a HP VNA and 437 power meter to get exact numbers.
OTOH the only numbers I really care about is attenuation in cables,
connectors, power splitters since that is the only place it really counts.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri at rogerhalstead.com>
To: <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter
> Although the Bird is recognized as the standard, even the gold standard,
> it is a very poor standard with the stock calibration being 5% of full
> scale. (I have 2) That is only if the slug hasn't been dropped or abused.
> You can have a slug, or slugs calibrated at specific power levels and
> frequencies with a specific sample line to +/- 3%.
>
> Yes that 5% is only 0.2 db, but on a stock slug at half scale is much more
> than 0,2 db.
> For rough measurements and up on-the-tower they are handy as well as
> staying legal. As SWR is a measurement between two powers they are fine
> for that although if you use two different slugs one may be +5 % and the
> other - 5% giving a 10% error at full scale although the extremes are
> unlikely
>
> The nearest slug I can find to the legal limit is 2500 Watts. 5% is 125
> watts, 125 watts is a bit over 8% (8.333%...)+/- 125 Watts, or
> 1500-125=1375 to 1500+125= 1625
>
> A calorimeter is an "accurate" way of measuring power and thus calibrating
> a meter at specific power levels and frequencies, but not convenient.
> HOWEVER you can't just use a calorimeter and say the result is traceable
> to NBS. That requires sending the calorimeter in to a qualified lab, to
> be calibrated periodically. At that point your measurements are second
> generation to NBS but kinda pricey for hams.
>
> OTOH those slugs are very expensive if you want to cover exciters and amps
> from 160 through 440, or higher.
>
> NORMALLY as the old saying goes, the Bird is "Good enough for who it's
> for!", but for efficiency measurements its limitations need to be taken
> into account. I consider the Bird "good enough" for measuring power loss
> in coax runs, SWR, and power out if not interested in absolutes, but
> although the FCC and others may consider it a standard, I do not. That
> may be due to my background. I base that on doing a wide range of
> measurements traceable to the NBS in industry over roughly 23 years. OTOH
> the equipment I used would be considered almost antique today as I quit in
> 87.
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
>
> On 5/2/2015 6:44 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 11:16:58 -0400
>> From: Gerald Williamson via Amps <amps at contesting.com>
>> To: drkirkby at kirkbymicrowave.co.uk, k7fm at teleport.com
>> Cc: amps at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter
>>
>> Hi All, I also use a Bird 43 as a gold standard. Why? Because I have it
>> already. A 5% error amounts to about .2 dB which is close enough for my
>> amateur needs.
>> The capability of easily changing connectors is a plus not available on
>> most if not all of the other meters.
>> Maybe we should call the 43 a "Brown Standard"?
>> 73,
>> Gerald K5GW
>>
>> ## What freq does bird /cd calibrate their slugs on ?? talking abt
>> the typ 2-30 mhz slug.
>> On a side note, IF a CD pep board is installed, or the model 83000 is
>> used, the accuracy is
>> +/- 7%.....when switched to pep mode. When a bird pep board is
>> installed on a bird 43, the
>> accuracy is now +./- 8%...when switched to pep mode. Both are +/- 5% in
>> average mode.
>>
>> ## The problem with the bird /cd meters /slugs is... they are +/-
>> 5/7/8 % of full scale...any where on the scale.
>> IE: 5% of a 1 kw slug = 50 watts. So if meter reads 800 watts....the
>> true pwr could be 750w...and meter
>> is reading 50 watts high. Or true pwr could be 850 watts..and meter is
>> reading 50 watts low.
>>
>> ## If meter reads 100 watts.... true power could be as little as 50
>> watts......or as high as 150w. In this
>> last case, the error could vary from 50-100% outa whack. Bottom line
>> is..u gotta use the smallest slug
>> for the job.
>>
>> ## with a 5 kw slug, my L4B reads 700w. ( low power mode, 1900v).
>> With a 2.5 kw slug, it then reads 650w.
>> With a 1 kw slug, it no reads 625 watts..which is very close to dead on.
>> Dunno if a bird slug is most accurate on the freq its calibrated for..vs
>> extremes in freq. IE: IF they calibrate it
>> at say 16 mhz..... what is accuracy at 2 mhz + also 30 mhz.
>>
>> ## IMO, the array solutions power master blows both the bird /cd slugs
>> away..hands down. If u don’t like their
>> NIST calibration, u are free to re-calibrate it urself.... since the
>> calibration can be changed in 1% increments....
>> and with a +/- 15% range. +/- 15%...in 1% increments is as good as is
>> gets. The calibration points are printed on each
>> individual coupler..for both frwd and rvs power...for both HF...and
>> again for 6m. 160-6m on one coupler is pretty good.
>> Then they have couplers for 144/220/432 etc.
>>
>> ## with no high swr alarm etc, etc, the bird doesnt cut it anymore.
>> Bird doesn’t sell wattmeters...they sell slugs.
>> The only advantage the bird /cd has..is it reads average power if u want
>> to. the array solutions will only read pep.
>> U cant see the effects of increased average power when using processor on
>> ssb mode.
>> Flip side is..the pep bargraph on the array solutions wattmeter is so
>> sensitive, it will easily show..dithering
>> when 3 % ripple is present on a B+ supply..which is typ when 8 series
>> 200 ufs cap are used. Any RF scope
>> will also show that effect.
>>
>> ## the only connectors I use are SO-239 and also 7-16 DIN. I don’t
>> use Type N.... but can easily add an inter series
>> adaptor if needed. My 3 kw coupler get the so-239....and my 10 kw
>> coupler gets the 7-16 din.
>>
>> Jim VE7RF
>>
>> adaptpr
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5863 / Virus Database: 4339/9683 - Release Date: 05/02/15
>
More information about the Amps
mailing list