[Amps] SPE 2K - noisy exhaust fans
RLVZ at aol.com
RLVZ at aol.com
Tue Nov 29 23:43:33 EST 2016
As mentioned, the SPE 2K is a very nice amp in many ways, but my problem
with them is the fans are very noisy. They use small 2" exhaust fans that
run at warp speed and it sounds like a jet engines in the shack. I don't
why SPE uses such small blower fans as there's room for larger ones. Larger
fans running at a slower speed would move the same amount of air, be
quieter, and last longer.
73,
Dick- K9OM
In a message dated 11/29/2016 9:57:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
amps-request at contesting.com writes:
Send Amps mailing list submissions to
amps at contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
amps-request at contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
amps-owner at contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Amps digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. A cheer for the SPE 2K (Charles H)
2. Re: 8877 Grid Connection DC or Not (Jim W7RY)
3. Re: A cheer for the SPE 2K (Bill Turner)
4. Re: A cheer for the SPE 2K (Catherine James)
5. Re: A cheer for the SPE 2K (Jim W7RY)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:35:31 +0000
From: Charles H <k4vud at hotmail.com>
To: "amps at contesting.com" <amps at contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K
Message-ID:
<CO2PR13MB01402C5AE01EBA7E871F9FDDF78C0 at CO2PR13MB0140.namprd13.prod.outlook.
com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I am quite happy with my SPE Expert 2K-FA.
Other than working well, what this amp provides are
-Good amplifier
-antenna switch, 6.
-SWR meter.
-two switched inputs.
de K4VUD
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:38:57 -0600
From: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry at gmail.com>
To: "Ian White" <gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk>, <amps at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 8877 Grid Connection DC or Not
Message-ID: <3AD57085A29447819FCA70446905810D at JimsLaptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
Thanks Ian.. I'll add it to the several versions of your board info that I
already have and use.
I know how amplifier metering works. This is a special application.
73
Jim W7RY
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian White
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:14 PM
To: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 8877 Grid Connection DC or Not
This reference, page 3 onwards, may explain what everyone means.
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/boards/triode/triode-manual.pdf
That is how it's done in the large majority of HF amplifiers, and in all
VHF
triode amplifiers where a well-grounded grid is essential.
73 from Ian GM3SEK
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Radio
>WC6W via Amps
>Sent: 29 November 2016 17:36
>To: Jim W7RY; AMPS
>Subject: Re: [Amps] 8877 Grid Connection DC or Not
>
>
>Hi Jim,
> Why not leave the grid grounded but, just measure the cathode and plate
>currents then subtract to calculate the grid current?
>
>73 & Good morning,
> Marv WC6W
>
>http://qsl.net/wc6w/
>
>--------------------------------------------
>On Mon, 11/28/16, Jim W7RY <jimw7ry at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: [Amps] 8877 Grid Connection DC or Not
> To: "AMPS" <amps at contesting.com>
> Date: Monday, November 28, 2016, 7:00 PM
>
> Has anyone run the grid of an 8877
> not connected to ground as far as DC is concerned?
>
> I really need to meter the grid current by bypassing the
> grid to ground with capacitors and several 10 ohm resistors
> in order to meter grid current. Metering grid current by the
> CT of the filament transformer, and the ? of the power
> supply cant be done. Because the power supply ? is
> directly grounded.
>
> Anyone had luck doing this?
>
> Thanks 73
> Jim W7RY
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 01:02:41 +0000
From: Bill Turner <dezrat at outlook.com>
To: Amps group <amps at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K
Message-ID:
<CY1PR0301MB11964E76B370DCFFAEBA063BC08C0 at CY1PR0301MB1196.namprd03.prod.outl
ook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:35:31 +0000, you wrote:
>
>I am quite happy with my SPE Expert 2K-FA.>
>Other than working well, what this amp provides are
>-Good amplifier
>-antenna switch, 6.
>-SWR meter.
>-two switched inputs.
>
>de K4VUD
REPLY:
I had one and I agree with all the above. It's only drawback is it
won't do legal limit on RTTY or other continuous carrier mode. After
about 5-10 seconds it overheats and drops back to MID power.
Other than that, an excellent amp. I now run an Alpha 9500 which does
not have that limitation, at about the same price but is not solid
state of course.
73, Bill W6WRT
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:45:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Catherine James <catherine.james at att.net>
To: Amps group <amps at contesting.com>, Bill Turner <dezrat at outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K
Message-ID: <1638129929.3119280.1480473913979 at mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Bill Turner <dezrat at outlook.com> wrote:
> It's only drawback is it won't do legal limit on RTTY or other
continuous carrier mode.
Very few amps will run legal limit on 100% duty cycle RTTY! I don't think
I'd want to
pay for the power supply that would need.
73,
Cathy
N5WVR
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:56:01 -0600
From: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry at gmail.com>
To: "Catherine James" <catherine.james at att.net>, "Amps group"
<amps at contesting.com>, "Bill Turner" <dezrat at outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K
Message-ID: <4C5DB1C41A8C41DEB16FB397B75DEDE1 at JimsLaptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
1 amp transformer is only $400.00. My power supplies run RTTY contests at
1500 watts no issues.
73
Jim W7RY
-----Original Message-----
From: Catherine James
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:45 PM
To: Amps group ; Bill Turner
Subject: Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K
Bill Turner <dezrat at outlook.com> wrote:
> It's only drawback is it won't do legal limit on RTTY or other
continuous
> carrier mode.
Very few amps will run legal limit on 100% duty cycle RTTY! I don't think
I'd want to
pay for the power supply that would need.
73,
Cathy
N5WVR
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
------------------------------
End of Amps Digest, Vol 167, Issue 40
*************************************
More information about the Amps
mailing list