[Amps] Defining CCS

[Jim Thomson]

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 06:54:45 +1300
From: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz at gmail.com>
To: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Defining CCS




On 27/12/17 14:55, Charles Harpole wrote:
> It is helpful to hold to old established nomenclature for clear
> communication.

<Helpful to who?? Communication by whom, of what, precisely??

I find all this drivel about amp specs and IMD to be a lot of puritan
nonsense and waste of vertical whitespace.

Build something perhaps?? No?

S

##  when folks are paying stupid amounts of $$$ for any type or brand of amp,
fine, but it had better be built and designed correctly for that kind of cash outlay. 
The typ usa built amp will be double the price in the uk, VK, ZL, by the time u add
in duties, VAT, shipping, difference on the dollar etc, etc. 

##  So yes,  generic amp specs, including devices used, duty cycle, IMD,  build
quality, etc, etc are NOT PURITAN DRIVEL !   IMO, they should be mandated to
meeting the old  FCC commercial specs for IMD....which is easily achieved. 

Jim   VE7RF