[Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C

[Carl]

Thats as bad as some current US based idiots claiming the Shuguang 811"A" is equal to the old RCA version

Carl

Im still trying to get this font size and Bold problem fixed... Im NOT shouting
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Fuqua, William L. 
  To: Alek Petkovic ; Carl ; amps at contesting.com 
  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 9:31 PM
  Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C







------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Fuqua, William L. <wlfuqu00 at uky.edu>
  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 9:27 PM
  To: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk at bigpond.com>; Carl <km1h at jeremy.qozzy.com>; amps at contesting.com <amps at contesting.com>
  Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C 

  I was not sure about this one since it states a plate dissipation of 220 Watts. 

  That is 60 Watts more than other data sheets.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk at bigpond.com>
  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 7:15 PM
  To: Fuqua, William L. <wlfuqu00 at uky.edu>; Carl <km1h at jeremy.qozzy.com>; amps at contesting.com <amps at contesting.com>
  Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C 

  CAUTION: External Sender


  Well, there is a section RF Power Amplifier and Oscillator Class C Telegrapghy in this datasheet.




  https://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/084/5/572B.pdf




  73, Alek.










  On 22/08/2021 6:11 am, Fuqua, William L. wrote:

    I am beginning to think that there were never any class C specs published for the 572B/T160L .
    73
    Bill wa4lav




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7lBhQB6anEiZinQk%3D&reserved=0


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com