[Amps] QRO HF2000 tank coil Q question

[MU 4CX250B]

Jim raises an issue which has troubled me lately, and that is whether
the added expense and headaches required to build a bandswitched pi-L
tank circuit is justified by the modest gain in harmonic attenuation
(over a simple, well-designed pi-network). I realize the pi- L is
universal in contemporary commercial amplifiers, but there is a price
to be paid for the added complexity and reduced reliability. For
example, the Alpha 9500 uses a complicated, custom, four-deck
bandswitch to do the job (replacement wafers are $200 each) and it
requires a couple of hours of study just to figure out how it works.
Ditto for, e.g., the old Drake L-75. Such contortions become
increasingly difficult when using heavy Radio Switch Model 86 or Model
88 bandswitches, as might be appropriate for 8877-level amplifiers. I
vaguely recall having Tom, W8JI weigh in on the debate, but don’t
remember the details. I think he doubted whether the benefit of a pi-L
was really worth the effort.
73,
Jim w8zr
Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 23, 2021, at 12:07 PM, Jim Thomson <jim.thom at telus.net> wrote:
>
>
> ##  per  Owen  Duffy, in  VK land, any tube  operating in class A, AB, or B  already has  7.5  db of  2nd harmonic
> attenuation..... before you add the  simple pI net.   He claims  with the pi net..and  a C1  Q  of just 8, the  2nd harmonic
> attenuation is  40 db..... which IMO, is more than ample for my needs,   None of my ants are resonant on their  2nd harmonic anyway.
> My  F12  40m yagi isnt even resonant on its  3rd  harmonic either.  The 40m yagi does resonate  on 24 mhz.