[CCF] FW: [CQ-Contest] TS850 versus TS570

jukka.klemola@nokia.com jukka.klemola@nokia.com
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:11:13 +0300


Ilman kunnon välitaajuussuodatusta olevien digiradioiden
sielu alkaa olla esillä.
Ennen riitti kun vastaanottimen etuasteet kestivät.
Sitten tuli digitaaliset vfo:t, kesti 10 vuotta ennen
kuin olivat entisten tasolla, edes lähellä niitä.

Nyt uusi ja vaativampi DSP tavara on kehityskaarella.
IC756ProII saattaa olla parempi kuin tämä mutta kuitenkin..

Päätelkää itse loput.

73,
Jukka

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext K4BEV@aol.com [mailto:K4BEV@aol.com]
> Sent: 29 August, 2002 23:09
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TS850 versus TS570
> 
> 
> In a message dated 8/29/02 10:31:57 Central Daylight Time, 
> tree@kkn.net 
> writes:
> 
>   > I think Kenwood fixed this problem - but I really don't know.  
> 
> I have a TS-57SDG - The problem Tree mentions is not apparent in this 
> particular radio.
> Trying to use it in a contest is a challenge, at best. Strong 
> stations do not 
> need to be too close to cause the AGC to pump, and you can't 
> turn it off.
> I had mine in the pick-up for quite a while and it was a fb 
> mobile rig, 
> although it is a bit large. I replaced it with a new IC-706 a 
> few months ago, 
> and WAY prefer the 570.
> The 706's digital remnants are extremely distracting on cw, 
> but it isn't a 
> bad SSB rig, and it's SMALL. Another not cool contesting radio.
> If you're into ham radio in general the TS-570 is a nice 
> radio. If contesting 
> is your game best check out something else. Of course if your 
> not into 
> contesting you're probably not reading this reflector.
> 
> 73, Don - K4BEV
> 
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>