[CCF] FW: [CQ-Contest] TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R
suitability
jukka.klemola at nokia.com
jukka.klemola at nokia.com
Fri May 9 00:47:21 EDT 2003
Kannattaa huomata erityisesti ongelma #2 vastaus jossa kerrotaan
DSP radioiden ominaisuudesta.
Jos on kunnon DSP ja kunnon välitaajuusfiltterit samassa paketissa,
homma toimii mutta leveä ja huonohko (keraaminen & >10kHz)
välitaajuusfiltteri, sitä ei oikein nykyisillä DSP:llä saa
parannettua.
73,
jukka
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Bill Tippett [mailto:btippett at alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: 08 May, 2003 19:46
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com; eric at k3na.org
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R
> suitability
>
>
> Hi Eric!
>
> I'm not an Orion user but soon will be (June?).
>
> K3NA wrote:
>
> >POTENTIAL PROBLEM #1:
> >
> >Can an Orion user clarify if any receiver continues to
> operate while
> transmitting?
>
> Orion is not SO2R in a box...neither is any other
> radio. Yes,
> both receivers are muted while transmitting.
>
> >POTENTIAL PROBLEM #2:
> >
> >Does anyone have better specs for the sub-receiver?
>
> The sub-receiver is probably closest to Ten Tec's Jupiter,
> but unfortunately ARRL's test in June 2001 was the month before
> they started doing 5 kHz measurements. Performance is most
> likely similar
> to other DSP radios using wide (12-15 kHz) roofing filters.
>
> http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0106.pdf
>
> Close In IMD Dynamic Range at 5 kHz Signal Spacing
> (ARRL Lab Results, Preamp off on 20M, 500 Hz BW)
>
> Radio IMDDR3
>
> Ten-Tec Orion 101*
> Elecraft K2 88
> Ten-Tec Omni 6+ 86
> Yaesu FT-1000MP 83
> ICOM IC-756 Pro 80
> Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark V 78
> ICOM IC-775DSP 77
> ICOM IC-756 Pro II 76
> ICOM IC-706 MkII G 74
> Yaesu FT-1000MP Field 73
> Kenwood TS-570D 72
> Kenwood TS-2000 69
> ICOM IC-756 67
>
> *Ten-Tec spec not yet verified by ARRL.
>
> In comparing prices, keep in mind that Orion at $3300
> may need only one optional filter (500 Hz). Orion's standard
> roofing filters (6000, 2400 and 1000) in combination with
> 3rd IF DSP probably yield better performance than other radios
> (using typical 12-15 kHz roofing filters) which have a FULL
> complement of dual-cascaded filters. The only reason I'm
> ordering Inrad's 400 Hz filter is to hopefully get IMDDR3
> performance close to the above at signal spacings UNDER 1
> kHz (for 160 mainly).
>
> I believe you missed the objective thinking it was SO2R.
> That objective would have had an extremely limited market and
> was never the goal. From Doug Smith's site, the goal was:
>
> "certain innovations and a level of performance previously
> unattained by
> any HF Amateur Radio transceiver, bar none."
>
> http://www.doug-smith.net/orion.htm
>
> I'm sure we'll all know more after ARRL does their tests!
>
> 73, Bill W4ZV
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CCF
mailing list