[CCF] Fw: CQWW CW OH6XX M/2 HP

Tue Nov 29 08:17:36 EST 2005

Skooret melkein tasan.. Luulen.
@OH4A, 3600 kusoa ja minun käsitys skooresta on 3.7M.

Mies Jyväskylästä, OH4II, oli pääoperaattori.
Minä tinasin ja kannoin ruokaa ja välillä vähän workinkin.

73,
Jukka OH6LI

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ccf-bounces at contesting.com 
>[mailto:ccf-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of ext Juha Rantanen
>Sent: 29 November, 2005 15:05
>To: CCF Reflector
>Subject: [CCF] Fw: CQWW CW OH6XX M/2 HP
>
>No tulipahan taas workittua. Ja taisi tulla uusi OH rekordi 
>jos kukaan muu ei workkinut M/2 luokassa.
>
>t. Juha
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <webform at b4h.net>
>To: <3830 at contesting.com>; <oh6xx at sral.fi>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:46 PM
>Subject: CQWW CW OH6XX M/2 HP
>
>
>>                    CQ Worldwide DX Contest, CW
>>
>> Call: OH6XX
>> Operator(s): OH6GLE, OH6XX
>> Station: OH6XX
>>
>> Class: M/2 HP
>> QTH:
>> Operating Time (hrs): 48
>>
>> Summary:
>> Band  QSOs  Zones  Countries
>> ------------------------------
>>  160:  274    11       59
>>   80:  994    28      116
>>   40:  665    34      119
>>   20: 1123    34      122
>>   15:  217    31      114
>>   10:   36     5       12
>> ------------------------------
>> Total: 3309   143      542  Total Score = 3,785,995
>>
>> Club: Contest Club Finland
>>
>> Comments:
>>
>> Yet another field day style two man multi op operation by 
>us. Decided to 
>> run M/2
>> so we didn't have to mind about the ten minute rule in M/S. 
>Running M/2 
>> left us
>> both FT1000MP's with amps, one tribander each and shared low band 
>> antennas.
>>
>> On 160m we did quite satisfying result. The antenna was a 
>sloper with 
>> lower end
>> about 3-4 meters from ground. Still the high end was at 
>about 55 meters 
>> hung
>> from ski jumping hill we have been using for years now. 160m 
>dipole is a 
>> big
>> antenna hung this way.
>>
>> On 80m we used the same inv-v we have been used to in past 
>few years. The
>> feedpoint is at about 60 meters above ground and it shows in 
>the result. 
>> We have
>> been very satisfied with this antenna and never felt weak on 
>the band. The 
>> only
>> problem is that one end of wire is pointed directly to 310 
>degrees which 
>> is W/VE
>> from us. Well that is the only way we can erect the whole thing.
>>
>> On 40m we used another sloper which more or less looks like 
>vertical with 
>> one
>> radial. It pretty much works like crap. We were surprised to 
>get as many
>> multipliers as we got. The runs were marginal. The antenna 
>is maybe the 
>> best we
>> can put up now as we have to put the whole station up in 
>Friday using 
>> daylight
>> which isn't too long time at this time of year in OH.
>>
>> 20m was our best band yet again. Sometimes it feels like we 
>are spending 
>> too
>> much time on 20m but then again many times that is the only 
>band we are 
>> getting
>> at least some decent runs. This time more than half of 20m 
>QSOs were DX's 
>> which
>> is great.
>>
>> 15m was open but not good enough for our small setup to get any runs 
>> going. The
>> mult total is rather good eventhough no zones 3 and 4 were 
>even heard.
>>
>> 10m was open to Germany and Chech Republic. Out of 36 QSOs 
>about 25 were 
>> made
>> there. The rest of them are the other 10 mults.
>>
>> The tribanders used were Force12 C3 and WRTC tribander by 
>Finnish Antenna. 
>> We
>> used quite a few stubs in eliminating the interstation 
>interference and
>> succeeded very well thanks to W2VJN's book. N1MM logger 
>crashed a couple 
>> of
>> times but nothing too serious. Had to restart laptops couple 
>of times 
>> because of
>> lost mouse control and lost internet connection through 
>mobile network.
>> Everything went well and we'll be back. We are too hard 
>headed to quit.
>>
>>
>> Posted using 3830 Score Submittal Forms at: 
>> http://www.hornucopia.com/3830score/
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>CCF mailing list
>CCF at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ccf
>