[CCF] [TOEC] Q on SAC rules "ENN ###"
sm6lrr at gmail.com
sm6lrr at gmail.com
Tue Sep 13 00:34:41 PDT 2011
Early morning typing on cell phone is unwise...
Let us use 5NN TAA for 599 011 and forget what I wrote before ;-)
LRR
----- Ursprungligt meddelande -----
Från:Ilkka Korpela
Till:ccf at contesting.com,toec at contesting.com,oh6kzp at sral.fi
Ämne:[TOEC] Q on SAC rules "ENN ###"
Hello all
I have been wondering about the strategy concerning my SAC operating.
Namely, one thing always to consider is your TX speed, and how to abb-
reviate the numbers, to make communication faster.
Now, if you do it OH8PF-style (a concept from the 1980s, early 1990s),
the speed is very fast, extremely fast. This assures high rates.
This strategy is very good, if you are not sanctioned for errors in
the other log.
Now, I expected the rules to say something about the accuracy checking
and about the way (math) score is reduced by incomplete QSOs. They don't
seem to. I know that there is SM2EZT's software to check the Qs, but what
are the (implicit, explicit) logics in it? I.e. the rules on valid QSOs?
We also have the PU! accuracy trophies. They will be based on relative (%)
score reduction. How are Qsos, points and multipliers lost in SM2EZTs
software?
Or am I just, as usual, missing a point/web-page somewhere?
BR ilkka, OH1WZ
--
Ilkka Korpela
http://www.helsinki.fi/~korpela
_______________________________________________
TOEC mailing list
TOEC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/toec
More information about the CCF
mailing list