[CCF] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] History of Low Power Category
Jukka Klemola
jpklemola at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 08:23:32 EDT 2014
Tehoista tositarinaa maailmalta.
CQ WW 2014 tehorajat ovat
1500W HP
100W LP
5W QRP.
http://cqww.com/rules.htm
Huomatkaa uusi multisingle Low Power luokka.
http://cqww.com/blog/?p=342
Säännöistä sovittiin että niitä ei käännetä suomen kielelle.
Jos jollakulla on säännöistä kysyttävää, minä voin vastata suomeksi.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Randy Thompson K5ZD
...
I was recently asked why the CQ Contests use 100W as the limit for low power
and the ARRL Contests use 150W. I had not really thought about this much
and wonder if anyone can explain how the limits were chosen.
The CQWW introduced a low power category in the writeup for the 1990 CQ WW
SSB Contest (and the rules for 1991). It is assumed that 100W was chosen
because it was easily accomplished by most barefoot transceivers or radios
of the time.
Can anyone explain the history of the ARRL selection of 150W? The slightly
higher power level can be reached by some radios, but it also encourages
"low power" stations to run an amplifier to gain that extra db between 100W
and 150W.
It would be nice if all contests used the same low power limit. Not because
one limit is more right than another, but so there would be less confusion.
Last year there was one entrant that entered CQWW as low power and then
realized they had exceeded 100W (I think they ran 110W or 120W). They asked
to have their entry reclassified to high power. Admirable integrity, but
unfortunately caused by the confusion between ARRL and CQ category limits.
Randy, K5ZD
More information about the CCF
mailing list