More than one call per setup
CASEDA at ECSUC.CTSTATEU.EDU
CASEDA at ECSUC.CTSTATEU.EDU
Mon Nov 8 15:02:49 EST 1993
That way I see/feel about it is that once you start operating, you call
should appear on the contest roster (and in this case, calls are associated
with names, so you name would be represented).
Therefore, if I was operating in a m/m, using the technique that a m/s
supposedly used, there would be nothing to stop me from, on a seperate transmittor
cruising the bands with my personal call and asking stations to QSY. There would be no limit to this!
So, if you call appears on the list of operators you better make damn sure it
doesn't appear in someone else's log (unless the station you are operating from
is using your call.) The only exception to this rule is if you were able to
change countries in the middle of the contest.
>From Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH at TGV.COM> Mon Nov 8 20:18:44 1993
From: Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH at TGV.COM> (Trey Garlough)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1993 12:18:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: NCJ change of address
Message-ID: <752789924.502018.GARLOUGH at TGV.COM>
I moved to a new address this weekend. Please make a note of the new
address and phone number for NCJ material:
Trey Garlough, WN4KKN
7375 Oak Ridge Road
Aptos, CA 95003
>From tree at cmicro.com (Larry Tyree) Mon Nov 8 19:38:05 1993
From: tree at cmicro.com (Larry Tyree) (Larry Tyree)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 11:38:05 PST
Message-ID: <9311081938.AA26602 at cmicro.com>
Well, I was afraid using the strong language in my last posting might
bring about some emotion (or maybe that was my intent).
Thanks to all of you who have sent me your personal comments. It seems that
EVERYONE who sent me a comment is in total agreement that this technique
should not be allowed.
So there you go!! Here is a case where maybe we can apply some peer
pressure. Be it resolved that the amateur radio contesting fraternity
frowns on using a second call to move multipliers when you are multi-single
and we think that the PJ1B operation should either remove any q
mults that were made this way, or classify itself as multi-multi.
Are there any PJ1B ops out there that can respond to this????
>From Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton at engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM Mon Nov 8 23:28:00 1993
From: Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton at engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM (Skelton, Tom)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 93 15:28:00 PST
Subject: Multi-single actions
Message-ID: <2CDED69B at admin.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM>
I agree with Tree's colorful response, because all the M/S
station is doing is circumventing a rule (10 minute) and
maybe breaking another (different calls, same transmitter???).
However, this is just the voice of a peanut-whistle
contester....73, Tom WB4IUX
From: Larry Tyree
Date: Monday, November 08, 1993 8:52AM
That technique of asking a station to move using a different call is
pure bullshit!! The log easily should be multi-multi. This is my
personal opinion and does not reflect the opinion of the CQ contest
group (not yet anyhow).
(member of CQ contest committe)
More information about the CQ-Contest