ARRL contest scores online
frenaye at pcnet.com
frenaye at pcnet.com
Wed Apr 19 22:43:05 EDT 1995
I haven't seen mention of it (unless it was posted when I was in
black-hole mode) but the ARRL Contest Dept is now posting complete contest
score information on the ARRL Info Server (and related FTP sites). The
intention is for the information to be posted the month after the contest
results are printed in QST (ARRL members get it quicker!)
Scores from the 1994 ARRL 10 GHz, 1994 IARU HF Championship and 1994 ARRL
160M contests are available now (file names: 10GHZ.SCR IARU.SCR and
160M.SCR). There's a lot of additional information available - see below!
Thanks KR1R NF1J and K8CH!
73 - Tom
HELP on using the ARRL's Automated Information Server (info at arrl.org)
INFO is a service of ARRL HQ. To use it, mail messages to:
info at arrl.org
Each line of the message should contain a single command as shown
below. You may place as many commands in a message as you want.
Each file you request will be sent to you in a separate message.
Only ASCII text files are supported at present.
If you have FTP access, all of these files can be obtained
from oak.oakland.edu by anonymous FTP in the files area
pub/hamradio/arrl/infoserver. Retrieve the file index.txt
in this directory for a complete listing of available files
listed by subdirectory with descriptions.
W1AW bulletins featuring news of interest to all amateurs (such
as FCC actions, DX news, satellite orbit data, propagation
trends, SAREX mission information and other items) are available
by email from the Netcom List Server. To subscribe to this
mailing list, send an email message to listserv at netcom.com with
any subject (it is ignored) and the following text as the body of
In addition, W1AW bulletins can also be FTPed from oak.oakland.edu
in the directory pub/hamradio/barc/w1aw-list. There are several
subdirectories under this for each bulletin catagory. See the
W1AW bulletin description files (.des extension) for more
information on each catagory.
Binary files mentioned in QST that accompany articles are *NOT*
available via the server. This is an email service only and can
not send binary files. HOWEVER, these files are also available
from oak.oakland.edu, in the directory pub/hamradio/arrl/qst-binaries
Valid INFO email commands:
help Sends this help file
index Sends an index of the files available from INFO
reply <address> Sends the response to the specified address. Put this
at the BEGINNING of your message if your From: address
is not a valid Internet address.
send <FILENAME> Sends "FILENAME" example: send PROSPECT.TXT
quit Terminates the transaction (use this if you have
a signature or other text at the end of the message.)
Note: your message will *not* be read by a human! Do not include
any requests or questions except by way of the above commands.
Retrieve the "USERS.TXT" file for a list of email addresses of
ARRL HQ staff.
DO *NOT* USE YOUR MAILER'S REPLY FUNCTION TO SEND YOUR NEXT REQUEST!
This message is from info-serv at arrl.org. Generate a new message
addressed to info at arrl.org instead. We set it up this way to
prevent failed mail from looping endlessly, annoying system
administrators. Mail sent back to info-serv at arrl.org ends up in
the bit bucket.
Your From: field or Reply-to: field in your header should contain a
valid Internet address, including full domain name. If your From:
field does not contain a valid Internet address, the answer will not
reach you. However, we have recently added a reply function as a
server command. If needed, the REPLY command should be the first
command in your message.
Where mailaddr is a valid Internet mail address (either user at domain
or bang address accepted.) An invalid address generates an error.
A wrong address results in non-delivery of your response.
The address given in the reply command is the address to which all
subsequent requests in the message will be sent.
If an error message is generated, it will be sent to the last reply
If anyone needs some help with the server, or has ascii information
files that they would like to archive on our server, additional
information or updates for any of our files, or suggestions for
improvements, please contact me here at ARRL Headquarters via email
or telephone (203) 666-1541.
73 de ARRL HQ, Michael Tracy, KC1SX, mtracy at arrl.org
Sample of files available from INFO: (There are lots more!)
FILENAME SIZE DESCRIPTION
---------------- ---- --------------------
#Note - If you are not yet an Amateur Radio operator retrieve the
#file prospect (send prospect) for information on how to easily get
#started in this fun hobby.
PROSPECT.TXT 2k How to get your Amateur Radio license
EXAMS.TXT 52k Current exam schedule info - updated bi-weekly
EXAMINFO.TXT 9k Examinations - what to bring - requirements
USERS.TXT 6k List of HQ Email addresses
ARRLCAT.TXT 39k Catalog of ARRL Publications - commercial content
JOIN.TXT 2k How become an ARRL member
SERVICES.TXT 5k A condensed list of ARRL membership services
TOUR.TXT 28k An electronic tour of ARRL Headquarters
DIR.HQ 5k Visiting ARRL HQ - diretions and tour information
HFBANDS.TXT 7k Breakdown of users of HF spectrum
W1AW.SKD 2k W1AW schedule of transmissions and operation
PRODREV.TXT 25k Listing of Product Reviews that appeared in QST
RFIGEN.TXT 37k How to solve an EMI/RFI problem - QST Lab Notes
RFISOURC.TXT 13k Where to buy filters - EMI-proof telephones etc.
ADDRESS.TXT 16k Lots and lots of ham/electonic company addresses
KITS.TXT 6k List of companies that sell kits
BBS.TXT 12k List of ham-radio land-line bulletin boards
HAMFAQ1.TXT 25k Introduction to the FAQ and Amateur Radio
HAMFAQ2.TXT 45k Amateur Radio Orgs, Services and Info Sources
HAMFAQ3.TXT 32k Amateur Radio Advanced and Technical Questions
Enjoy this ARRL service. Please direct comments or suggestions (or
flames) to mtracy at arrl.org. 73 from ARRL HQ, Michael Tracy, KC1SX
----------End of Original Message----------
E-mail: frenaye at pcnet.com
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box 386, West Suffield CT 06093
>From H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil at seattleu.edu Thu Apr 20 03:59:32 1995
From: H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil at seattleu.edu (H. Ward Silver)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 19:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Bouvet Split Technique and ethics
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9504191952.B17540-c100000 at bach.seattleu.edu>
On Thu, 20 Apr 1995, Bruce Strong wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Apr 1995, N6MM/W6BAB wrote:
> > > > Ethics, schmethics...if you don't listen to the DX station and follow
> > > > their instructions (even somewhat cryptic instructions) then I'd say your
> > > > chances are pretty slim, regardless. It was a fairly clever solution to
> > > > some astounding pileups and separated the sheep from the goats rather
> > > > quickly.
> > To me, and, evidently, just me, the ethics problem relates not to the
> > cleverness of separating the 'sheep from the goats' but, by seemingly
> > implying, or not making it clear, where he would be listening and,
> > it also seems, to be giving out apparently misleading information -
> > witness all your comments about the pileup being at the wrong place -
> > the station is now taking up 3 places on the band; one for himself,
> > one for the 'deserving', and one for the 'undeserving'.
> > This would be ok, at least to me, if dx chaseing were the only game
> > in town, but many, many amateur radio operators don't care to join
> > the hunt and this technique necessarily clutters up the available
> > spectrum more than other techniques might.
> > Bruce
> > hs0zbo at sura1.sut.ac.th
This does raise certain considerations of bandwidth. I think it depends
on how much "spreading" is done. I think it's perfectly acceptable to use
20kHz on phone; 7 SSB channels out of 70 available. 40kHz would be really
pushing it and the 100kHz used by 5A0RR was "right out"! I would even
consider the use of several "auxiliary" channels up and down the band to
The irritation comes, I believe, from DX activity on channels that usually
are more or less pileup-free; above 14275, say. So if a bunch of DXers
just pounce on 290, regardless of who might be there, it can be a serious
pain to the other users. This is the DX station's fault - he or she
should have listened to find a clear frequency first, not just blindly
choose a spot. It's also the responsibility of the callers not to QRM a
But back to the real issue - using bandwidth over time. It's entirely
fair to suggest that by using more spectrum at any one given time, the
amount of bandwidth required over an extended period is actually reduced.
For example, wide pileups on Day 1 and 2 of a big expedition, followed by
small listening segments on the remaining days. An expedition of very
limited duration, like BS7H, can't take advantage of the bandwidth-time
savings, though. Hmmm, bandwidth (cycles/sec) multiplied by time (sec) is
a dimensionless quantity (channel-seconds?) that would measure the overall
efficiency of a DXpedition. The smaller the quantity, the less the
disruption to the other users of the band.
So to address the bottom line, DXing (and contesting activity, too) should
not be simply spread out everywhere, anytime. DX stations and their
callers should avoid disruption when possible. However, there are
techniques that are useful to more quickly reduce the volume of callers,
thus reducing the amount of bandwidth required in channel-seconds. This
generally makes everybody happier, DXer and non-DXer alike. Furthermore,
the higher the rate, the less the perceived need for misbehavior on both
73, Ward N0AX
More information about the CQ-Contest