All these new club calls...
WR3O at music-city.tdec.state.tn.us
WR3O at music-city.tdec.state.tn.us
Mon Sep 11 12:15:59 EDT 1995
In the Sprint rumored scores (and other recently published
scores), I have noticed quite a few new club calls. Some of
the club calls appear to belong to individuals who are well
known in contest circles. Here are a couple of examples:
KC5NWX STEINMAN AMATEUR RADIO CLUB LIC ISU 11-APR-1995
CLUB 6719 SHELL FLOWER LN LIC EXP 11-APR-2005
DALLAS TX 75252 LST UPD 11-APR-1995
KR0Y STEINMAN, JEFFREY S IS RESPONSIBLE
KC5OYM ALLIGATOR AMATEUR RADIO CLUB LIC ISU 31-MAY-1995
CLUB P. O. BOX 10465 LIC EXP 31-MAY-2005
MIDLAND TX 79702 LST UPD 31-MAY-1995
N5RZ BOWEN, RALPH E IS RESPONSIBLE
What is the deal with these new calls? Have you guys set up clubs
in your homes, or is this part of the process required to get a
desired vanity call? I am definately NOT looking to start any flames
here, please. I am just trying to understand why several top notch
contesters have applied for club call signs. (And of course,
wondering if I need to do the same to get the call I'm after!)
Thanks for any enlightenment.
73, Kirk WR3O
>From Steve Merchant <merchant at crl.com> Mon Sep 11 16:36:44 1995
From: Steve Merchant <merchant at crl.com> (Steve Merchant)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 08:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: N4TQO Sprint - Clueless in California
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950911082748.19361A-100000 at crl.crl.com>
This Sprint was the shakedown cruise for the cw station for VK9LX, less
the amp. Tested FT990, TopTen, Dunestar, TR s/w & keying circuits,
laptop, radio interface box, plus assorted cables and other junk.
The radio (of YK0A and 3D2 Conway fame) was not set for electronic TR --
sorry for the choppy cw.
I spent a lot of time trying to figure out why I couldn't send a serial
number from my S&P exchange. Apologies to those early Q's who had to ask
for it. <Never did figure it out.>
With all the weird new radio/computer stuff, I didn't dare run the amp, too.
N4TQO Steve CA Low Power - Team NCCC
148 x 35 = 5180 <This probably means NCCC Team #17 next time -- sri, Scott>
FT990 <100w>, F12 C4 @ 45', dipole @ 40'
New calls, names were lotsa fun. I must admit I don't understand all the
negative reactions to this -- guess I don't take it seriously enough.
Thanks for the Q's.
73, Steve N4TQO
merchant at crl.com
>From H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil at seattleu.edu Mon Sep 11 18:02:11 1995
From: H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil at seattleu.edu (H. Ward Silver)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 10:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: N0AX Sprint
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9509111011.B17474-b100000 at bach.seattleu.edu>
Hi Gang, or should I say, "The Assemblage of Derek-like-objects"...
If I have to copy one more Derek mutant, I will HURL! It's a good thing I
didn't have a big, hefty mallet within arms reach ;-) At least all the
Eds were spelled the same! Next time, it's five-letter code groups for
the lot of you...
40 was the place to be from Washington. 20 was hot for a little while,
but rapidly moved south. CA was getting all the calls, so off to 40 where
it really came alive at about 0100. Hopping back to twenty turned up RI
and WV mults before it went completely away...no late KL7 mult this time!
My new 80-meter half-slopers really work great...the goats in the pasture
are temporarily spared from vertical arrays...until I miss something on
80, that is.
Oh yeah, 223 x 43, low-power, for 9589. Still haven't cracked 10k on
low-power, but did manage to squeek by K7SS while he was fighting over
frequencies ;-) "Beat Danny" is the eternal (and futile) battle cry for
us up here in the corner, so I'm thrilled. However, if I had to use his
home antennae, and he mine, I wouldn't bet that the outcome would remain
the same!
Watch for Jerry's Kids as the Grateful Ed goes out in style this weekend.
73, Ed/Jerry/Ward, N0AX
>From H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil at seattleu.edu Mon Sep 11 18:11:36 1995
From: H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil at seattleu.edu (H. Ward Silver)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 10:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Ed Cheese
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9509111036.C17474-9100000 at bach.seattleu.edu>
Here 'tis, the Grateful Ed team score:
N0AX 223 43 9589
NN7L 237 39 9243 HP
K7SS 231 40 9240 estimated mults...he's still counting
NL7GP 215 41 8815 using K7LXC's station
KA9FOX 221 39 8619 at W9UP
AA4GA 166 36 5976
K7NPN 128 33 4224
WA7UVJ 121 33 3993 computer went *poof* at 0015, ugh
KE2PF 121 31 3751
N0BSH ?? reported to be on a little, haven't heard
====
63450 Good Show, Ed-Heads!
73, Head-Ed, N0AX
>From n4zr at ix.netcom.com (Pete Smith) Mon Sep 11 18:12:41 1995
From: n4zr at ix.netcom.com (Pete Smith) (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 10:12:41 -0700
Subject: Sprint reflections
Message-ID: <199509111712.KAA17632 at ix3.ix.netcom.com>
Dave wrote:
(stuff deleted)
>I don't mind (probably nobody minds) having fun with the
>contest--goofy names, themes, etc., but I feel that this practice is
>dangerous in that it causes one to lose the urge to compete and
>displaces some of the integrity of the contest. Rather than boost
>activity as has been suggested this type of "game" whereby the usual
>winners can pretend they are operating the 1974 sprint and still kick
>just about everybody's butt will tend to reduce future activity IMHO.
>
>The Sprint isn't an equitable contest. Not just anybody can win. I
>think that is why I like it so much. But we cannot just shrug-off
>the guys who are always there in the lower two thirds, or the guys
>who just give us points so we can battle each other.
>
>Or more guys like me will just SIGH and go over to 2M SSB in the VHF
>contest with its extremely slow rates, but where EACH contact is
>really worth something.
>
>At least, in the future, I ask that if a large enough group of ops
>decides to manipulate the contest in such a way that the competitive
>nature of the event is changed, please publicize it so I or others do
>not go ahead and spend time or money or energy to really try. I have
>planned to build a nice van-trailer station that I could drive to
>rare states for the sprint etc. Maybe not anymore.
I think Dave's right. I have had an uncomfortable feeling about this
private contest of and for the "elite," but couldn't put my finger on what
was wrong, quite. I couldn't get on till late, and don't have any low-band
antennas yet, so just hung around on 20 for about 25 QSOs. When my decent
antennas are up, I'm going to look forward to trying to improve on my
mediocre past scores -- it would be a shame if this contest within a contest
stuff continues (in whatever form) and discourages activity as it apparently
did this time.
73, Pete Smith N4ZR
n4zr at ix.netcom.com
**WEST** Virginia
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list