Pittsburgh Address
k4sb at avana.net
k4sb at avana.net
Fri Sep 13 14:24:06 EDT 1996
Guys, I know you mean well, but you are going to really foul up some
610Vs and possibly get them bounced. For the last time, quoating from the
instructions: "If you wish to hand carry or courier your feeable
application, it should be enclosed in a sealed envelope with the
approxiate Post Office address CLEARLY MARKED ON THE OUTSIDE. .....
Applications may be DELIVERED to the bank at the following address."
End quote....caps added for emphasis.
KISS: The envelope with the 610V MUST be addressed to:
FCC
Amateur Vanity Call Sign Request
POB 358924
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5924
The Mellon Bank address shown on the instructions ONLY SHOWS THE ADDRESS OF
THE BANK. THIS IS THE ADDRESS FEDEX WOULD DELIVER TO!!!!!
Once Mellon gets it, they would open the Fedex package, and THEN ROUTE THE
ENVELOPE TO THE APPRORIATE POB.
FYI The FCC has 88 POBs with Mellon.
73, Ed
-------------------------------------
Name: ed sleight
E-mail: k4sb at avana.net
Date: 9/13/96
Time: 1:24:06 PM
This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
>From tanoury at ix.netcom.com (Anthony Tanoury) Fri Sep 13 18:39:06 1996
From: tanoury at ix.netcom.com (Anthony Tanoury) (Anthony Tanoury)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:39:06 -0400
Subject: Help with TR Log e-mail updates
Message-ID: <32399C3A.216 at ix.netcom.com>
The last four TR Log updates I've received via e-mail contain numerous
CRC errors according to PKunzip. Tried fixing with PKzipfix without
success. Using Netcom ISP for mail and never had this problem before.
I've been getting e-mail updates for over a year. Any ideas as to the
cause or a fix?
Tony - N8FME
>From kk5ep at netdoor.com (Michael Causey) Fri Sep 13 20:10:31 1996
From: kk5ep at netdoor.com (Michael Causey) (Michael Causey)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 14:10:31 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Tnx everyone for CT vs TR Info
Message-ID: <199609131910.OAA22629 at netdoor.com>
The large number of respondents makes it impossible to thank everyone
individually, but thanks to everyone who gave feedback on my dilemma. I
got 86 responses and 95% of the hams who have used both CT and TR prefer TR.
So I will be going with TR. Thanks a million guys, ya'll really came
through for me this time, I'm proud to belong to the fellowship. 73, Mike
KK5EP.
>From cns-sd at ix.netcom.com (Art Wallace) Fri Sep 13 20:29:41 1996
From: cns-sd at ix.netcom.com (Art Wallace) (Art Wallace)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 12:29:41 -0700
Subject: EMF Problem Solved
Message-ID: <199609131929.MAA07190 at dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com>
.
W E A R E S A V E D !
Received my Damark Catalog today and lo and behold, an item that will
solve all our EMI problems. It is called an Earth Energy Pendant and is
worn around the neck. Here is what the catalog says:
"The Earth Energy Pendant is designed to be a grounding device for the
increasingly prevalent electromagnetic fields (EMFs) surrounding TV's,
computers and other electrical devices. Increased health and
revitalized energy are just a couple of the many benefits reported by
some wearers of this tiny white metal energy rod. Made of magnetic
alloys, it also has a rare Takionic Energy Bead mounted on its sterling
silver cap. The Takionic crystal, developed in Japan, is tuned to the
Schumann Resonance (7.83hz). Choose from a silken cord or sterling
silver chain."
Wow! For only $89.00 you can prevent your neighbors from having two
headed kids and you can give them "Revitalized Energy". If Japan
developed the Takionic crystal, then maybe they could just put them in
every rig they ship along with some decent CW filters.
Get you Visa or Mastercard ready!!!
Art KK6XN :)
>From WX0B-JTERLESKI at postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Jay Terleski) Fri Sep 13 21:52:26 1996
From: WX0B-JTERLESKI at postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Jay Terleski) (Jay Terleski)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 15:52:26 -0500
Subject: 160m spark gap contest station
Message-ID: <3239C98A.6983 at postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Sorry to bother everyone with an actual technical question.
I Know that several of you have been there and done this, so I hope to
save myself
some time.
In getting my dual 1/4 wave hybrid coupler fed cardiod 160m antenna
working, I
noticed an electifying event, which kinda makes me wonder if I am going
to blow
something up down the line.
About a month ago I was walking under one of the 160m wires watching a
thunderstorm
heading my way. It wasn't on top of me yet. But lots of lightning was
a few miles
away.
I heard this "sparking" noise and traced the source to the end of one of
the 160m
vertical feedline. It was not grounded and was arcing from the center
conductor of
the pl259 to a metal fence post 2 inches away from where the connector
lay. I had
disconnected it from the hybrid coupler to work on the coupler to add
some switching
relays. I slid it over to the post to make a ground connection to
hopefully stop the
possibility to Zot the cable.
This is a raised single radial system, and even when the feelines will
be connected
to the coupler they will not be directly grounded except for the shield.
So the questions are as follows:
1. Should I make an big inductor and attatch it to the feedpoint of the
wire vertical
and ground the other end to drain this static charge?
2. If I dont can this charge ZOT my coax, or worse yet caps in the
hybrid coupler or
my radios.
3. How do the rest of you deal with this?
4. Will the FCC issue me a citation for using a sparkgap transmitter on
160m? ;^)
Respectfully submitted.
Jay wx0b
>From ATHSU at mca.com (Hsu, Aaron T.) Fri Sep 13 22:18:30 1996
From: ATHSU at mca.com (Hsu, Aaron T.) (Hsu, Aaron T.)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 14:18:30 -0700
Subject: EMF Problem Solved / JRC JST-245 Opinions Wanted
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=MCA%l=CORP-NT-1-960913211830Z-1057 at corp-nt-1.mca.com>
Funny, I sent $135 to International Radio last year for a Harmonic
Resonance Crystal and received both it and a 400Hz CW filter for my
Kenwood TS-450S!
Seriously, when I received the 400Hz filter, they also sent in a
zip-lock bag a piece of raw crystal stock along with a note. The note
said something about the current trend of novelty companies selling
pieces of crystal for $$$ as fix-alls for everything. They wanted to
send a piece of crystal to their customers just for the fun of it.
On another note...
Does anybody here have any experience with the JST-245 (or it's 6M-less
sibling the JST-145) from JRC? I know this question's probably been
asked before, but I don't remember seeing any responses. I'm
considering upgrading from my TS-450S and want an idea as to how the
JST-245 (or 145) would do contest-wise. I'm also considering the
TS-850S/AT, but being a 5-year old model, I'm wondering if the newer
'245 would be better.
I've read the review of the '245 in QST and they gave it a thumb's up.
It's a little more than I want to spend, but if it's worth it, I'll
consider it. The Kenwood TS-870S is also under consideration, but given
their long-term service policy, I'd rather not.
Thanks and 73!
- Aaron Hsu, KD6DAE
athsu at mca.com
dae at pacbell.net
PS. Although I haven't noticed any good luck from the raw crystal, the
400Hz CW crystal has worked GREAT!
>----------
>From: cns-sd at ix.netcom.com[SMTP:cns-sd at ix.netcom.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 13, 1996 12:29 PM
>To: CQ-CONTEST at tgv.com
>Cc: cns-sd at ix.netcom.com
>Subject: EMF Problem Solved
>
>.
> W E A R E S A V E D !
>
>Received my Damark Catalog today and lo and behold, an item that will
>solve all our EMI problems. It is called an Earth Energy Pendant and is
>worn around the neck. Here is what the catalog says:
>
>"The Earth Energy Pendant is designed to be a grounding device for the
>increasingly prevalent electromagnetic fields (EMFs) surrounding TV's,
>computers and other electrical devices. Increased health and
>revitalized energy are just a couple of the many benefits reported by
>some wearers of this tiny white metal energy rod. Made of magnetic
>alloys, it also has a rare Takionic Energy Bead mounted on its sterling
>silver cap. The Takionic crystal, developed in Japan, is tuned to the
>Schumann Resonance (7.83hz). Choose from a silken cord or sterling
>silver chain."
>
>Wow! For only $89.00 you can prevent your neighbors from having two
>headed kids and you can give them "Revitalized Energy". If Japan
>developed the Takionic crystal, then maybe they could just put them in
>every rig they ship along with some decent CW filters.
>
>Get you Visa or Mastercard ready!!!
>
>Art KK6XN :)
>
>
>From w2vjn at rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge) Fri Sep 13 21:01:35 1996
From: w2vjn at rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge) (George Cutsogeorge)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 96 20:01:35 GMT
Subject: 160m spark gap contest station
References: <3239C98A.6983 at postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Message-ID: <M.091396.130135.66 at ppp055.rosenet.net>
Regarding the Ben Franklin effect: If your antenna switching system does not
ground all wires, there should be some method of draining the charge before it
can build up to damaging levels. The easy way to do this is with one or more
carbon resistors from each floating line to ground. Almost any value that can
safely take the transmitted voltage will work. I have been using 2 220K 1
watters in series. Yes, inductors will work as long as they can take the
transmitter output. Something like a 2.5 mHy rf choke will work.
I don't think the static charge will damage coax as it will normally arc
somewhere outside of the dielectric.
And yes, it can damage your solid state radio. When everything had tubes, this
was not a problem. I can remember sparks jumping across the contacts on my key
being an early warning of an approaching storm and giving notice to throw the
knife switch.
> So the questions are as follows:
>
> 1. Should I make an big inductor and attatch it to the feedpoint of the
> wire vertical
> and ground the other end to drain this static charge?
>
> 2. If I dont can this charge ZOT my coax, or worse yet caps in the
> hybrid coupler or
> my radios.
>
> 3. How do the rest of you deal with this?
>
> 4. Will the FCC issue me a citation for using a sparkgap transmitter on
> 160m? ;^)
>
> Respectfully submitted.
>
> Jay wx0b
>
>
----
George Cutsogeorge, W2VJN
Umpqua, OR.
http://www.qth.com/topten
>From desmith at telalink.net (Doug Smith) Fri Sep 13 23:46:10 1996
From: desmith at telalink.net (Doug Smith) (Doug Smith)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 17:46:10 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: 160m spark gap contest station
Message-ID: <199609132246.RAA16538 at eve.telalink.net>
At 08:01 PM 9/13/96 GMT, you wrote:
>I don't think the static charge will damage coax as it will normally arc
>somewhere outside of the dielectric.
Not always. I've seen it arc through the outer jacket to ground.
Admittedly, that was an arc from high voltage RF (the coax was being used as
a matching capacitor for a shunt-fed tower) and not static charges.
73 Doug
W9WI
Douglas E. Smith W9WI/4 desmith at Telalink.Net
1385 Old Clarksville Pike 72777.3143 at compuserve.com
Pleasant View, TN 37146-8098
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list