[CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure
Greg Becker
na2n at ifam.com
Sun Aug 9 09:38:30 EDT 1998
Bruce Sawyer wrote:
> BTW, that's also an interesting note in Item 18 about "proposed change in
> local club competition eligibility criteria". The last I heard, at least
> some CAC members from "Big Contest Club" were opposed to any expansion in
> local club eligibility because it might take away from the "Big Club" in SS
> competition. In other words, "We don't want to give people a choice." But
> the fact that K4VX reported on any change at all tells me that the big
> contest club CAC guys must not have carried the day. Is it too much to hope
> for????
Well, I can't comment about "Big Contest Club", but I CAN tell you the
members of the top-ranking Local category club voted overwhelmingly IN
FAVOR of restructuring the Local criteria, in order to increase
competition in the category. Good for the club? Not really, in all
probability.
Good for contesting? Absolutely.
--
Greg Becker, JD, PhD NA2N na2n at ifam.com
IFAM - Ideas For American Manufacturers
Rondout #343 F&AM - Hendrick Hudson #875 F&AM
Hudson Valley Contesters & DXers - Local club
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list