[CQ-Contest] Multi-Op in NAQP
Bill Coleman AA4LR
aa4lr at radio.org
Thu Dec 17 16:36:44 EST 1998
On 12/17/98 16:04, John Unger at w4au at contesting.com wrote:
>1. Pretty basic first question, what's the strategy for operating with two
>stations? Running and picking up mults, or just trying to run on two
>different bands?
Well, that's a good question. Perhaps those that have the winning
strategy won't bother to comment since that would increase the
competition. <grin>
Many of the multipliers for a given band will come find you if you run,
so running both stations is a good way to maximize Qs.
Sometimes things get slow on the second band. That's usually time go to S
& P for a few Qs.
>2. If you keep a separate log for each station (xcvr) as required by the
>rules, how do you dupe check if station 1 later operates on a band that
>station 2 was on earlier? Or is each xcvr confined to a specific band(s)?
This is what God made computers for.... Several contest logging programs
can do this if you have a computer for each station and network them.
>3. Do people use more than two xcvrs, but then only transmit from two at
>any given time?
Well, the rules restrict you to a 10 minute wait between band changes, so
having more transceivers is of limited use, since you can't (like a
single op) change bands on a whim. Sometimes a third receiver is useful
if you're trying to decide when to change bands.
One disadvantage to the NAQP M/2 rules is that you can't move multipliers
through several bands. The best you can do is pass a multiplier to the
second station. Sometimes you may want to pass Qs as well.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at radio.org
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list