[CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager

[Tommy Tow]

After having great performance from the GAP Challenger in a maritime
environment I considered the Voyager-decided against it for the reasons
previously posted.  I am so impressed with the Force 12 products, both
quality and PERFORMANCE- that after discussing verticals just this week with
Tom, N6BT at Force, I am convinced to go with their designs for my low band
verticals--U might want to check them out.  73, Tommy WD4K
-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Flanagan <dflanagan at libelle.com>
To: Bob Patten <n4bp at bc.seflin.org>
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, November 12, 1998 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager


>
>>Has anyone on this list used the Gap Voyager on 160 Meters?  A friend is
>>considering buying one and asked me to find out if anyone in the
>>contest community has any experience with it on 160 Meters.
>
>Past reviews have the Voyager only marginally better than nothing on
>160, very good on 80 and 40, and a dummy load on 20.
>
>YMMV.
>
>73, Dick
>--
>Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada DM09db (South of Reno)
>Visit http://www.qsl.net/cvrc/
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com