[CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question
Bill Coleman AA4LR
aa4lr at radio.org
Tue Aug 3 10:39:58 EDT 1999
On 7/30/99 10:25, Hans - K0HB at k0hb at arrl.org wrote:
>Since there is such a small number of multipliers (79 last time
>I looked) and they only "count" once (you get no additional mult
>for working them on additional bands) why would a SO station use
>packet in SS?
Very simple question -- even simpler answer:
Because its fun.
For several years now, there have been a number of operators who have
been running packet and sending in single-operator logs. They know who
they are.
While I have never operated packet single-op, I can certainly understand
that hams who live and die by packet through the year find it a fun and
fastinating way to enjoy the hobby. Many of these operators are DXers and
not necessarily contesters.
Sweepstakes is one of the oldest and most enjoyable contests we have. It
doesn't have big scores or really high rates, so it's approachable by
many hams.
All other major contests have made provisions in their rules for assisted
operators. It is about time that sweepstakes did so as well. Better that,
than to have folks submit assisted scores as single-op, as has been done
for so many years now.
Now, if you go back, Hans, and ask the unasked question -- why bother?
The answer is exactly the same for all other contests, too. Ever since
the appearance of assisted operator categories, unassisted single ops
have posted better scores, with few exceptions.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at radio.org
Quote: "Boot, you transistorized tormentor! Boot!"
-- Archibald Asparagus, VeggieTales
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list