[CQ-Contest] SS-LOG Super-Check

[LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
> [mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Greg Becker
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 1999 12:12 PM
> To: Thomas E. Francis; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS-LOG Super-Check
>
>
>
> >        Where I do have a problem with Super Check is accuracy from
> >        the sending end, but that's for another thread.
>
> Well, maybe not.
>
> I'd be interested to see how many of the stations whose exchanges
> I "busted"
> also had others do the same thing. For example, if I busted KA2AHW's check
> as 78 instead of 88, I wonder how many other stations also busted
> his check.
> This might show that there was indeed a sending accuracy issue. I got my
> punch list from Tree and was appalled at a 5+% error rate.

OK, let´s say this is a sending error, I guess you have almost the same
amount of this kind of error as anybody else. So, there´s no point in your
worry.

73
Ernesto Grueneberg - LU5CW (ex LU2BRG & LU6BEG)
< mailto:lu5cw at geocities.com>
LU5CW homepage < http://pagina.de/lu5cw>
LT1F homepage: <http://badpower.com.ar>
 





--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com