[CQ-Contest] Apr wpx and busted q
George Fremin III
geoiii at kkn.net
Thu May 6 06:40:36 EDT 1999
Guy Olinger, K2AV writes:
>
> There is an alternative:
>
> TWO-WAY ACCURACY BONUS for each end of a qso with all elements correct
> at both ends.
>
> ADDED TO the scores by the log checking programs. No more penalties
> except for DQ for the usual kinds of ugly, on purpose stuff. Zero
> point busted QSO's.
>
> Publish the bonus portion of the scores with the scores. Looks at
> accuracy in a POSITIVE way.
I do not see how this is any diffrence than the
current system.
When I went to school there were some teachers that
scored tests by starting at 100 points and taking
points AWAY, others started at 0 and ADDED points.
I guess one method could be said to be positive and one
negative but I don't think many of the students
were fooled into thinking these were any diffrent.
--
George Fremin III
Johnson City, Texas "Experiment trumps theory."
K5TR (ex.WB5VZL) -- Dave Leeson W6NL
geoiii at kkn.net
830-868-2510
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list