[CQ-Contest] condx in naqp phone..

[Paul E. Knupke, Jr.]

Conditions were decent but it may be a story of two contests (west coast and
the rest)  I had a hard time hearing what was being said during the 3830
gathering at the end (normal s9+ summertime static in Florida) but it seemed
that some thought that the guys out west did better.

20 was very crowded for a NAQP.  15 was much better than last summer.   40m
was decent but didn't hear much from the west coast .. thought did work a
few CA stations.

K4XS commented: "10 very good, and worked around 150 dx stations including
FH5,HS0."

I also worked several DX stations on 10 and 15 meters.

Only worked two non W/VE NA stations 8P and Cuba.  No KP2, KP4, KH or KL
heard.

Since I was no where near a rig during the CW weekend (I was on vacation in
NE VE3) I can't compare.

Activity seemed quite good!

73
Paul
N4PK (ex-KR4YL)

Paul E. Knupke, Jr.
pk at ij.net
Largo, FL  ICQ# 605259
----------------------
Amateur Radio: N4PK
ASM WCF Section
N4PK/R 442.150 (103.5)
Clearwater, FL


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
> [mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of K5ZM
> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 12:51 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] condx in naqp phone..
>
>
>
> Hmm.. so far no mention from anyone as to the condx. Were they as dismal =
> as they were in the cw portion?=20
>
> Should I be regrettng having opted to work instead?
>
> 73, Mike K5ZM=20
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com