[CQ-Contest] Next WRTC should be WRSOC
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Wed Jul 19 13:36:36 EDT 2000
In a message dated 7/19/00 11:27:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
Jim_Neiger at XonTech.com writes:
>
> I say NUTS to that. A major part of contesting IS the endurance. 48
> hours -YES. And that's why the CQ WW remains the most popular contest,
> effectively combining knowledge, experience, strategy, speed, accuracy and
> endurance. Mr. Milktoast's need not apply.......
>
Endurance is a major part of contesting, but not an appealing part. The
reason CQWW does so well is not that is is 48 hours long, but that it attacts
more activity from more parts of the world than any other contest. For WRTC
I would rather have winners determined on knowledge, experience, strategy,
speed, and accuracy, than the ability to function well for 48 hours without
sleep.
Jim K8MR
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list