[CQ-Contest] Re: Bad practices identified
Rick Bullon
kc5ajx at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 25 00:52:44 EDT 2000
OK I've read to use QRL, ?, ie etc. That is fine for CW but what the proper
way for us phone ops to do it?
The only way I know is " Is the frequency in use" That would really cover up
and exchange if you can't hear the distant or weaker station, this would
really make the guy mad who is running on the frequency.
73
Rick
KC5AJX
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>From Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc at dialup.mplik.ru Mon Jul 24 23:15:34 2000
From: Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc at dialup.mplik.ru (Igor Sokolov)
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:15:34 +0600
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: Bad practices identified
References: <9b.83248d5.26ae0b37 at aol.com>
Message-ID: <001101bff5bc$b88f0260$08b8fea9 at dialup.mplik.ru>
I do, and the usual reply is "e ".....
73,
Igor, UA9CDC
> << I thought the standard was "ie" (.. .), which is even shorter than >>
>
> Well, I've been acontestin' many a year, but don't recall ever hearing
this
> one!
>
> Geo...
>
> George I. Wagner, K5KG
> 973-539-8893
> 973-539-8894 fax
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list