[CQ-Contest] WPX & "whats a tribander?"

[Guy Olinger, K2AV]

One of those who finished in the top ten in CW section was dipoles plus
an inverted L for 40/80/160, not even a tribander. Shouldn't
demonstrated abuse be at the root of a discussion like this? What abuse?

This whole thread has been like the medieval arguments over how many
angels could fit on the head of a pin.

- - . . .   . . . - -     .   . . .     - - .   . - . .

73, Guy
k2av at contesting.com
Apex, NC, USA

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Ogden <jono at enteract.com>
To: <k6ll at juno.com>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & "whats a tribander?"


>
> on 5/7/00 11:11 AM, k6ll at juno.com at k6ll at juno.com wrote:
>
> >> My suggestion is to take a look at the past results.  What are the
> >> WINNERS
> >> using?
> >
> > In 1999, both modes, and 2000 ssb, the high scorer used a
> > KT-34XA at 49' and never operated on 40, 80, or 160.
>
> Agreed.  I don't know of any who landed in the top 5 who "cheated."
Take a
> look at the scores and station descriptions.  Look up the web pages of
the
> top finishers.
>
> 73,
>
> Jon
> NA9D   (ex: KE9NA)
>
> -------------------------------------
> Jon Ogden
> NA9D
>
> Member:  ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA
>
> http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
>
> "A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com