[CQ-Contest] Slow code
Bob, N5RP
n5rp at pdq.net
Wed Nov 8 08:45:41 EST 2000
At 17:43 11/7/00, Kenneth E. Harker wrote:
>I operated in the CW Sweepstakes at N5XU M/S. I spent hours and
>hours "running" stations way high up in the bands going somewhere around
>15-17 WPM.
<snip>
> A majority of the stations answering my CQs did so going faster than
>I was going by at least 5 WPM, many by a margin of 10 WPM or more. I
>had
>to ask for a lot of fills and repeats, but I kept at it.
===============================>
Hi Ken,
I always keep a set of paddles connected up to my rig just so I can
slow down for you fellows that aren't pretentious enough to act like
the code whiz they might not be.
As for your getting a lot of replies at a much faster speed than you
were calling CQ....
Well, what you have discovered is that a lot of contesters cannot
actually use paddles to send code. They must rely on packet to get the
call, and a keyboard to load up the call for actual proper code
transmission.
Hang in there, and congrats for trying to understand this unique aspect
of ham radio.
Bob Perring
...........................................
Amateur Radio Station N5RP
mailto:N5RP at pdq.net
N5RP Station Page: http://freeweb.pdq.net/perring/station.html
WP2Z '99 CQWW SSB Pictures: http://freeweb.pdq.net/perring/wp2zpix.html
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list