[CQ-Contest] Packet pileups

[Scott/Lori Jasper NE9U/KA9ZGD]

I'm not sure if there were many "spoof" spots, but there sure were a lot of "busted" spots.
I'm sure many operators just qsy'd to the spotted frequency and worked whatever was spotted without listening, even though it wasnt
the correct call sign.
Guess thats where the UBN will get' em.
Scott  NE9U


jasper at powercom.net
Amateur Radio NE9U/KA9ZGD/KB9TTO/TBA
Scott/Lori/Alex/Arielle/Jasper
----------




From: Stewart Cooper <coopersg at odl.co.uk>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Packet pileups
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 3:24 AM


It seems like a miracle to me that we haven't got mass generation of 'spoof'
spots during major contests. Those who use packet to their advantage in very
quickly grabbing spots, doing an auto QSY and shouting their callsign, all
in the same deft flick of the wrist will probably be doing it for the last
time. It's inevitable, in the same way as 14.195 has turned into a Tower of
Babel, that the same will happen to packet. Anyone can log in to an internet
cluster node, type in any callsign they like, and start generating garbage.
Whether it's clever garbage, or just rubbish, wouldn't even matter. That's
going to make packet more of a hindrance than a help. Then we'll have to all
be authenticated and provide ever changing passwords to log on to the
cluster...then we'll have to pay to use the service...and so on.

Stewart GM0F/GM4AFF

PS My submissions don't usually make it to the reflector, so let's hope this
does.


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com