[CQ-Contest] Exisiting Penalty System is Working Very Well
kl7ra
kl7ra at blizzard.gcgo.nasa.gov
Wed Sep 6 16:51:02 EDT 2000
Tree, Doug and others write:
Reasons for penalty-
And they follow with a long list of logic, NONE OF WHICH ARE TRUE when
one or more competitors in the class/section "cheats" by recording the
contest. The incentive to "cheat" is promoted by the disproportional
penalty (greater the penalty, greater the reward for recording) and
the fact it's [impossible] to be caught UNLIKE excessive power or
packet assist.
If you read pro-penalty posts you find no mention of "recording". The
reason is obvious. Recording a contest to review and edit the log
screws the system. Too bad really as I strongly support computer log
checking and my hope was to reduce the problem before it became common
place. Probably too late.
73 Rich KL7RA
Note for Tree - There is a Cray C90 computer on E-bay. If you got that
for log cross-checking, you would be in hog heaven.
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list