[CQ-Contest] Dupes and computer logs
k8gt at arrl.net
k8gt at arrl.net
Fri Sep 8 00:14:36 EDT 2000
K3BU at aol.com wrote:
Guess I'm confused, Yuri. First, you say we shouldn't have a 3 QSO
penalty, and now you are saying we should have a 10 QSO penalty. Or
is that for everyone other than you?
73, Gerry K8GT
>
> If that is the problem, then simple solution could be to setup checking
> program to look for similar -1 calls within few lines and hit the sucker with
> 10 QSO penalty if you find entrant to be clever at guessing game.
>
> Do we all have to be penalized for remote possibility of the above reason?
>
> Penalty is for cheating, breaking rules, errors and mistakes should be
> removed from the scoring. We see the opinion of the contest committee and
> checkers. If the committee would like to get opinion of contestants, maybe it
> wouldn't hurt to do the opinion survey and perhaps adjust the checking
> process. It can only help. We should try to make contests more friendly and
> inviting to newcomers, rather than scaring them off with penalties and
> punishment.
>
> Yuri
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list