[CQ-Contest] Ionospheric heating

[CYBERGURUES]

With all the tera watts that daily surround our bands, I don't believe our
contest activity may cause any significant difference, except in those areas
of the planet where contest stations radiate more RF than the broadcast
service :-)
Is there a scientist in the reflector to tell us if the radiated RF can
increase the ionization of the atmosphere and thus improve HF propagation
conditions?
73
Martin, LW9EUJ
PS: any reading material on this topic?
-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
[mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]En nombre de Tony Field
Enviado el: Jueves, 05 de Abril de 2001 08:52 p.m.
Para: cq-contest at contesting.com
Asunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ionospheric heating



From: "Tree N6TR" <tree at kkn.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ionospheric heating

  > Finally, for those who think the ionosphere might be non-linear -
  > I think they need to think about what would happen as a result.
  > As W8JI mentioned, there would be a big mess created by the
  > mixing effect.....
etc...

Although I don't really understand this area at all, it seems to me to
be reasonable to assume that there are definite non-linearity's in the
ionosphere.

How do the various layers change during day/night if the effect is
truly 'linear'.  Obviously the layers themselves are an indication of
non-linearity.

Another non-linearity is the "Arctic Flutter" effect that is often
heard when communicating with the northern part of Europe.  This must
be caused by some refractive effect (i.e. non-linearity).

Another non-linear observation - why is RTTY and PSK31 so unreliable
when the path is close to the poles.    Also I have experienced very
non-linear RTTY signals (looking at a scope output) when simply
transmitting over 'clean' paths in North America.  Seems to me that
this is not just a polar effect.

The third is obvious multi-pathing due to ionosphere (and possibly
atmospheric on 10M) effects.  This can be a shear effect or a layer
effect.

Maybe the term 'linear' should be better defined when talking about
the ionosphere.  I suspect (and am quite possibly wrong) that Tom W8JI
and Tree N6TR are really talking about 'consistency of effect' rather
than an 'electrical linearity'.  Maybe I am barking up the wrong
tree????

tony field (ve6yp)
field at nucleus.com
ve6yp at rac.ca
http://www.qsl.net/ve6yp
http://www.nucleus.com/~field


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com