[CQ-Contest] MRRC NAQP CW Team

[Jeffrey Clarke]

  Hi,

   We have some slots left on the Mad River NAQP CW teams for anyone 
that is looking for a team for this weekend. Please email me and
indicate if you will be full-time or part-time. 

                        73's  Jeff  KU8E

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x at kr6x.com  Thu Aug  2 16:52:52 2001
From: Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x at kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 08:52:52 -0700
Subject: [CQ-Contest] GUPI versus IUPG
References: <200108012333.f71NXRA31094 at contesting.com>
Message-ID: <042f01c11b6b$314a7b60$ede3c23f at kr6x.org>


Don't get so excited, Jim.  Dick isn't under attack here, and neither
is K3EST, N6TR, or any of the others who've provided this service to
the contesting community.  His (their) efforts are fully appreciated.
And, at least in my mind, our discussion here is an attempt to
strengthen his (their) hand.

Providing a consensus within the contesting community as to what
should constitute an invalid QSO finding during log checking will make
the task of all log checkers easier.  The recipe should not be kept
secret out of concern that disclosure will make logging abuse more
easily accomplished, either, but should be a consensus that is shared
between all contesters and all contest sponsors - the CQ committee and
the ARRL being only the two most prominent in our immediate, USA
centric, concerns.

And it should be a recipe that maintains the highest standards of
justice that can be incorporated into the process.  Only then can guys
like Dick who toil countless hours in our aid escape the ravages of
unfair criticism for their efforts.

----- Original Message -----
From: "JAMES NEIGER" <N6TJ at msn.com>
To: "Dale L Martin" <kg5u at hal-pc.org>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] GUPI versus IUPG


>
> The unsung hero, who toils COUNTLESS HOURS, to make sure the CQ WW
is as
> accurate as can be is N6AA.  And he can't even get on here and
defend him
> self against the many inaccuracies and innuendos.
>
> N6TJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dale L Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:39 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] GUPI versus IUPG
>  =20
>
>
>
> > It is also reminding me that giving out ANY information about the
> > process is really not a very good idea, as it causes more harm
than
> > good, and I have to go into damage control.  Maybe I will get
lucky
> > and the ARRL will "fire" me for my comments and I can go do
something
> > more fun.
>
>
>
> Three cheers for Tree, Trey, George, and whomever else is involved
in any
> way with logchecking of our contest logs.
>
> hip-hip-hooray
>
> hip-hip-hooray
>
> hip-hip-hooray
>
> Thanks, guys!
>
>
>
> 73,
> dale, kg5u
> >
>
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com