[CQ-Contest] 3 QSO penalty
Bill Coleman
aa4lr at arrl.net
Fri Aug 24 15:34:27 EDT 2001
On 8/24/01 2:05 PM, Maurizio Panicara at i4jmy at iol.it wrote:
>If the other guy didn't get your confirmation (or he doesn't feel sure you
>implicitly gave anything that serves as it) he took the risk.
In this example, the other guy DID get a confirmation.
>If you didn't get confirmation and didn't give yours, or didn't feel the QSO
>is completed, then this is not a QSO that has to be logged on your side.
In this example, you DID get confirmation.
The QSO took place, you just messed up when you logged it.
>Penalty is just there to avoid guessing and gambling, no matter why.
I agree there should be a penalty (although I think 3 Qs is harsh), but
there also should be a way to submit certain QSOs as check QSOs only.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list