[CQ-Contest] Logging Dupes

[Fred Hoffert NA2U]

Agree, Jim.  Everytime this thread comes up I say/think the same 
thing...Work them dupes!

73,

Fred/NA2U
CWMAN...I'D RATHER WORK CW!!!
"Je mange donc je suis."


>From: Jim Reisert <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
>To: snichols at mvosprey.com (Scott Nichols), cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Dupes
>Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:14:26 -0500
>
>
>You're certainly entitled to your opinion.  However, now you are penalizing
>the station who didn't get a contact the first time for whatever reason, as
>well as yourself, because the first QSO probably doesn't count in your log
>either.
>
>I think it's become obvious here that the good operators (the ones who make
>the top-10 boxes year after year) work the dupe and move on.  If you want
>to get into the box, this is one of the ways to do it - NEVER leave a
>potential QSO on the floor, for whatever reason.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C
>
>At 02:29 PM 12/18/2001 -0400, Scott Nichols wrote:
>
>>Dupes are considered blemishes in my log...I therefore use F7 very often
>>and then move on...That's my own opinion...
>
>
>--
>Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
>USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>








_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com