[CQ-Contest] NAQP RTTY

[Tom Baugh]

Was wondering what fellow contesters thought of the eekend conditions for
the NAQP RTTY? I think conditions were pretty decent for a mid summer
contest for staeside contacts. We'll report scores when I get a chance but
haven't heard any news... what did you think?

Tom

AE9B

tombaugh at discoverynet.com
http://www.qsl.net/ae9b


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu  Mon Jul 23 01:31:02 2001
From: Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:31:02 -0400
Subject: : Re: [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQ WW for Busting Packet Cheaters!
In-Reply-To: <1kmllt0sk0jsmse4qioaddlt4ndvfhq2dl at 4ax.com>
Message-ID: <200107230031.f6N0V2c29416 at chmls20.mediaone.net>


To help the club score.  Small to medium stations operating part-time
and running SOA are the bread-and-butter of the top club scores (FRC,
YCCC etc.)

On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 06:53:58 -0700, Bill Turner wrote:

>Ok, color me naive, but why would anyone SEND spots and not
>receive them.  Altruism?  Seems like a waste of contest time.

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu  Mon Jul 23 01:33:21 2001
From: Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:33:21 -0400
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQ WW for Busting Packet Cheaters!
In-Reply-To: <NABBJJMHMOJDAICFPIFDKEIOCPAA.jmaass at columbus.rr.com>
Message-ID: <200107230033.f6N0XMc01370 at chmls20.mediaone.net>


On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 10:24:53 -0400, Jeff Maass wrote:

>> I suspect the nail in the coffin is finding a busted call in someone's 
>> log that corresponds to a packet bust.
>> Barry
>> 
>
>No, because someone else in the pile (who is using packet) could 
>send the broken call as part of an exchange. 


Doubtful.  I get into LOTS of packet pileups running M/M from KC1XX and
I don't think I've EVER heard someone give the DX station's callsign as
part of the exchange!

73 - Jim AD1C

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com