[CQ-Contest] SO1R v SO2R

Healy, Rus RHealy at microwavedata.com
Thu Jul 26 10:21:11 EDT 2001


A few days ago, Shelby, K4WW, wrote:

>Are most SO2R users so adamantly opposed to a seperate category simply
>because they don't want to give up their advantage?

Nope. It's because the category is called "Single Operator," and it should
remain that in spirit. Single operator: One brain, one set of hands, eyes,
ears, etc. Put another way, no operating assistance from any other person.
That's why some of us have strong feelings about keeping the Single Operator
category as it's currently defined (at least in most major contests).

>Are most SO2R users
>against operating in any contest that applies the "10 minute rule" to SO?

I certainly am. It would limit the amount of FUN I can have in operating
contests. That would suck.

>SO2R should not be discouraged or restricted, but should not be allowed to
>compete directly against SO1R?

Answer: SINGLE OPERATOR = SINGLE OPERATOR.

--73, Rus, K2UA

ps: There's a pretty lively debate happening on a contesting.com forum about
this right now.


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list